PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall35/ 100Poor
Men’s 2xl Aramark Flexfit Uniform Work Shirt Blue

Aramark · Scrubs & Work Uniforms

Men’s 2xl Aramark Flexfit Uniform Work Shirt Blue

Good

Standard work shirt. No waterproofing or stain treatment disclosed.

Verdict: SkipStandard cotton-poly work uniform with no disclosed chemical treatments; typical occupational-wear risk profile and no established brand safety concerns.

Basic cotton-polyester uniform shirt with no PFAS-relevant treatments mentioned. Aramark provides no public PFAS disclosure for this product, typical for standard workwear.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cotton/polyester blend, unspecified finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

No specific dyeing process is disclosed for this Aramark product. Azo dyes and heavy metal mordants (chromium, nickel) used in cheap polyester-cotton blends can leach in sweat or during initial wash cycles, though levels are typically below occupational exposure thresholds for work-wear. The blue color raises mild concern for chrome or cobalt dyes, but no established contamination record exists fo

Source: FDA
70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding from polyester blend

The polyester component will shed synthetic microfibers during wear and laundering, a documented property of all polyester textiles. This poses minimal direct health risk to the wearer but contributes to microplastic aquatic pollution. Washing in a lint-trap or mesh bag reduces shed load by 30-40% per published studies.

20/ 100
🐛

Pesticide residue

Conventional cotton (assumed for this unspecified product) may retain trace organophosphate or pyrethroid pesticides from cultivation. Residues on finished fabrics are typically below regulatory concern, but organic certification is absent here, leaving residue status unknown. Laundering reduces any residues further.

Source: EPA
70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fibers

Antimony trioxide is a standard polyester catalyst and can remain as trace residue in finished fibers. Levels in apparel are well below occupational exposure limits and are not acutely hazardous during wear, but represent low-level synthetic contamination inherent to polyester production.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No permanent-press, wrinkle-free, or shrink-resistant claims are made for this product, suggesting no intentional formaldehyde resin cross-linkers are present. Formaldehyde use is common in cheaper work-wear, but absence of marketing language around easy-care or crease retention implies traditional finishing only.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a cotton-polyester blend work shirt with no disclosed water-repellent, stain-resistant, or flame-retardant finish. The polyester component (~50% typical in Aramark uniforms) is chemically inert when unworn but can shed microfibers under friction and laundering. Cotton carries lower chemical risk but may have residual pesticide residues from cultivation unless organically certified, which is not stated here. The unspecified finish means no intentional Teflon-type coating, silicone, or durable-press resin treatments are claimed, reducing synthetic chemical exposure compared to performance-enhanced work shirts.

The brand's record and disclosure

Aramark is a large uniform and facility services company with limited public transparency on fiber sourcing, dyeing processes, or chemical compliance beyond basic legal requirements. No major product recalls, OEKO-TEX certification, or sustainability certifications are publicly associated with this product line. The brand has not published specific PFAS policy statements, suggesting standard industry practice (no waterproofing = no intentional PFAS addition, but residual contamination from manufacturing is possible at standard levels). This reflects typical corporate silence rather than active risk concealment.

How it compares in its category

This shirt sits in the mid-tier occupational-wear segment. It offers no premium safety certifications (like GOTS organic or Cradle-to-Cradle) but also avoids marketed stain/water treatments that introduce additional chemicals. Comparable generic cotton-poly work shirts from retailers like Dickies or Carhartt have similar hazard profiles unless they carry waterproofing or antimicrobial claims. For a basic, untreated blend, this falls within the safer subset of work apparel.

If you buy it

Wash separately from other clothes in the first 2-3 cycles to minimize dye bleed into lighter fabrics. Use warm water and standard detergent; avoid bleach or high heat in the dryer, which can degrade polyester. Expect normal microfiber shedding during laundering (common to all synthetics). Replace when seams show stress, collar/cuff fray significantly, or fabric becomes thin at high-friction points (underarms, side seams), typically 1-2 years of regular use.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Aramark has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More scrubs & work uniforms grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.