PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Arc'teryx Men's Gamma Pants

Arc'teryx · Rain Pants

Arc'teryx Men's Gamma Pants

Bad

Moderate concern; Arc'teryx applies water-repellent coating to technical pants but doesn't disclose PFAS status.

Verdict: SkipNylon rain pants with water-repellent coating carry moderate PFAS concern due to undisclosed treatment; non-PFAS hazards are minimal if properly maintained.

Arc'teryx's Gamma Pants feature water-repellent coating coatings typical of high-performance outdoor apparel, historically reliant on fluorinated compounds including PFAS. The brand doesn't publicly commit to PFAS-free treatment or verification.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and potential chemical leaching

Arc'teryx does not disclose whether water-repellent coating uses PFAS or fluorine-free chemistry. Traditional perfluorinated water-repellent coating coatings can gradually shed into sweat or wash water, especially after friction and laundering; fluorine-free alternatives (if used) have less historical evidence of systemic leaching but are still relatively new.

70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding from nylon weave

Nylon textiles shed microfibers during washing and wear, contributing to aquatic microplastic pollution. This is not a direct hazard to the wearer but is a downstream environmental concern; washing in a microfiber-catching bag (Guppyfriend, Cora Ball) reduces release by 75-90% per studies.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon technical fabrics can be treated with formaldehyde-releasing resins for wrinkle resistance or shape retention, but Arc'teryx's premium construction typically avoids this for performance wear. No formaldehyde concerns are on record for this model.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Arc'teryx uses professional-grade dye houses (primarily in Asia) that generally meet OEKO-TEX or similar standards. No heavy metal or banned azo dye violations are documented for Arc'teryx apparel, and nylon dyes are typically lower-risk than natural fiber dyes.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Seam-tape adhesives and leachables

Sealed seams use polyurethane or polyester-based tapes; Arc'teryx's taped seams are professionally applied and stable under normal use. Adhesive leaching is not a reported issue for this brand, and heat/sweat exposure in a rain pant is low compared to base layers.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Gamma Pants use nylon as the base fabric with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on perfluorinated compounds (PFAS), though some manufacturers have shifted to fluorine-free alternatives; Arc'teryx does not publicly specify which type is used on this model. Nylon itself is stable and non-toxic under normal wear, but the water-repellent coating chemistry is the material concern here. The pants also likely contain nylon thread, seams, and potentially polyester in blended construction, which add minimal chemical risk under typical use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Arc'teryx is a Salomon-owned technical apparel brand with a strong reputation for durability and performance but a weak track record on chemical transparency. The company does not publicly disclose water-repellent coating chemistry on product pages or in accessible sustainability documents, and has not signed ZDHC (Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals) or similar manufacturing accountability frameworks. No major product recalls or chemical contamination incidents are on public record for Arc'teryx apparel. This silence on water-repellent coating treatment is common in the outdoor industry but indicates lower priority placed on PFAS disclosure compared to brands like Patagonia or The North Face.

How it compares in its category

Most premium rain pants at Arc'teryx's price point ($200+) use nylon with some form of water-repellent coating finish; the main difference is whether that treatment is PFAS-based or fluorine-free. Competitors like Patagonia increasingly offer fluorine-free options and publish that choice; Arc'teryx's silence suggests possible reliance on traditional PFAS water-repellent coating, which is still common in technical textiles. Lower-cost rain pants often use polyester or polyurethane membranes, which carry different tradeoffs (less durability, more plasticizer leaching risk). Arc'teryx's engineering and fit are superior, but the chemical opacity is a category weakness for this brand.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water with mild detergent and avoid fabric softeners, which can degrade the water-repellent coating and increase shedding of any loosely bound chemicals. Do not dry clean, as solvent exposure can leach coating materials. Line dry or tumble dry on low heat; high heat is not a risk but is unnecessary. Re-apply water-repellent coating treatment every 1-2 years if water beading diminishes; use a fluorine-free alternative (like Revivex Pro) to reduce PFAS exposure over the product lifetime. Inspect seams and zippers regularly for damage; compromised seams may allow internal moisture and bacterial growth in humid storage.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Arc'teryx has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Rain Pants

Patagonia Women's Torrentshell 3L Pants

Patagonia

Women's Torrentshell 3L Pants

Nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade45Poor
Poor

Medium risk. Lower-concern choice within waterproof apparel backed by brand commitment. Verify specific batch before purchase.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More rain pants grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.