PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
The North Face Women's Antora Rain Pants

The North Face · Rain Pants

The North Face Women's Antora Rain Pants

Bad

High risk. Silent on water-repellent coating chemistry, ask The North Face directly if PFAS-free alternatives matter to you.

Verdict: SkipNylon rain pants with standard water-repellent coating treatment; no established safety concerns beyond PFAS uncertainty in water repellent coating. Brand transparency is limited but product poses low chemical risk in normal use.

These pants use nylon with a water-repellent finish typical of technical rain gear. The North Face doesn't disclose whether their water-repellent coating contains PFAS; many brands have switched to PFAS-free options.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon outer with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The specific water-repellent coating chemistry is proprietary and undisclosed. Modern alternatives to PFOA/PFOS exist, but The North Face has not stated which is used. The risk of skin or systemic exposure from wearing is low, but manufacturing/disposal pathways may involve PFAS contamination, this is graded under the PFAS assessment.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

Coating degradation or off-gassing during manufacturing/storage

water-repellent coating coatings can emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during production and initial storage. Out-of-box odor may reflect residual solvents. This typically dissipates with air exposure within hours to days and poses negligible inhalation risk in normal outdoor wear.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Nylon polyester breakdown (microfiber shedding)

Nylon itself does not fragment or shed microplastics under normal wearing or washing. Only if the fabric is mechanically damaged (pills, abrasion, tears) can microscopic fibers enter water systems, but this is not a product-specific defect.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public record or recall indicates The North Face uses azo dyes or formaldehyde resins in the Antora's nylon construction. The dyes and finishes appear to meet standard apparel safety. If concerns exist, OEKO-TEX or Bluesign certification would be absent markers.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No reports of cadmium, lead, or antimony in Antora seams, zippers, or water-repellent coating. As a mainstream retail product sold in North America, it complies with Consumer Product Safety Commission limits. No specific testing has been made public.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Antora uses nylon as the outer shell, a synthetic polymer chosen for lightweight strength and water resistance. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to nylon is the primary chemical concern; it creates a water-shedding surface but formulation details are proprietary. Nylon itself is stable and does not leach under normal wearing conditions, and there is no evidence of formaldehyde resins or azo dyes in standard North Face rain gear construction.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face has not publicly committed to PFAS-free water-repellent coating chemistry or published detailed chemical ingredient lists for their water-repellent coating treatments. The brand does not market this product as PFAS-free or use third-party certifications like Bluesign or OEKO-TEX for chemical safety. This silence does not confirm PFAS presence, but reflects common industry opacity on water-repellent formulations. Direct contact with The North Face is the most reliable way to confirm water-repellent coating composition if PFAS avoidance is a priority.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream rain pants (including competitors like Columbia, Arc'teryx, and Patagonia) use similar nylon-with-water-repellent coating construction and face identical PFAS transparency gaps unless explicitly labeled otherwise. Brands actively marketing PFAS-free alternatives (e.g., some Patagonia styles, Rab) are minority players and typically carry higher cost. The Antora represents standard-practice textile chemistry in performance outerwear; it is neither more nor less risky than comparable mass-market rain pants on the market.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water with mild detergent to extend water-repellent coating durability and avoid heat that might accelerate any coating degradation. Do not dry-clean, as solvents can strip or interact with water-repellent coating chemistry unpredictably. Reapply water-repellent coating treatments as needed (annually or when water no longer beads on the fabric) using commercial water-repellent coating sprays or wash-in products. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent textile degradation over time.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
The North Face has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Rain Pants

Patagonia Women's Torrentshell 3L Pants

Patagonia

Women's Torrentshell 3L Pants

Nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating finish

PFAS Grade45Poor
Poor

Medium risk. Lower-concern choice within waterproof apparel backed by brand commitment. Verify specific batch before purchase.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More rain pants grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.