PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall2/ 100Bad
Bogner Men's Jervis Down Ski Jacket

Bogner · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Bogner Men's Jervis Down Ski Jacket

Bad

water-repellent coating raises PFAS concern or Bogner offers no transparency on fluorochemical use.

Verdict · SkipModerate PFAS concern via water-repellent coating plus standard down-jacket risks; buy only if you accept fluorochemical uncertainty and practice proper care.

This down ski jacket uses a water-repellent coating finish typical of premium ski wear, historically dependent on PFAS-based chemistry. Bogner shares no public disclosure about PFAS avoidance.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Down-filled jacket with polyester shell; water-repellent coating water-repellent finish (composition unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Bogner Men's Jervis Down Ski Jacket is made of, ingredients and materials

The Jervis combines a polyester shell (synthetic, durable, water-resistant base) with down fill (natural insulation from bird feathers and clusters). The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish is applied to the shell to shed water without fully waterproofing it, allowing breathability. Bogner does not disclose whether this water-repellent coating uses fluorinated chemicals (PFAS) or newer non-fluorine alternatives, which is the primary uncertainty here.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Bogner does not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry; industry standard until recent years was C6/C8 PFAS. Likely present but unconfirmed. See separate PFAS grade (20/100).

Source, ATSDR ↗
45/ 100
🏭

Down fill quality and mold/bacterial contamination

Down is hygroscopic and can harbor mold or bacterial growth if stored damp or in high humidity. No brand testing or certification data is publicly available; risk depends on user care and storage conditions.

70/ 100
🫧

Polyester microfiber shedding

Polyester shells shed microplastics during washing and wear. While not unique to Bogner, this jacket offers no documented recycled or low-shed polyester alternative. Impact is cumulative across the product's lifespan.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or public reports of formaldehyde issues in Bogner jackets. Premium ski apparel typically meets EU/OEKO-TEX standards, but Bogner does not advertise certification.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Metal zippers and snaps are standard; no known contamination reports for Bogner. Down jackets do not typically use lead or cadmium pigments, and polyester dyes are generally screened in EU manufacturing.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Bogner is a heritage German ski-apparel brand without publicly documented sustainability certifications (like Bluesign or GOTS) or explicit PFAS/fluorochemical reduction commitments on their website. The brand has not issued statements banning or phasing out legacy fluorinated water-repellent coating finishes. This silence is typical of older premium outdoor brands but leaves buyers without confirmation of lower-concern alternatives.

How it compares in its category

Ski jackets routinely use water-repellent coating finishes to meet water-shedding performance expectations. Premium brands like Patagonia and Arc'teryx have adopted or are transitioning to PFAS-free water-repellent coating (e.g., wax-based, polyurethane), while Bogner's lack of public commitment suggests possible reliance on older fluorinated formulations. Mid-range brands vary widely; transparency is rare across the category.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cold water using mild detergent, avoiding fabric softeners that can degrade water repellency. Air-dry completely; never tumble-dry or iron, as heat can degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially release volatiles. Reapply water-repellent coating treatments only with PFAS-free alternatives (check the label explicitly). Inspect down fill for escaping clusters and seal small holes promptly to prevent loss and mold growth in damp storage.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bogner has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Allbirds Jackets & Coats Allbirds Full Zip Wool Blend Puffer Jacket Women Size Small

Allbirds

Jackets & Coats Allbirds Full Zip Wool Blend Puffer Jacket Women Size Small

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Wool blend with synthetic fill (likely polyester)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Allbirds Jackets & Coats Allbirds Men's Trino Puffer Jacket Full Zip Wool Blend Forest Green Coat Size Sm

Allbirds

Jackets & Coats Allbirds Men's Trino Puffer Jacket Full Zip Wool Blend Forest Green Coat Size Sm

65GoodPFAS grade
  • wool blend (natural fiber dominant)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment - undisclosed chemistry

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Allbirds NWT Womens Medium Green Natural Run Mid Layer 1/4 Zip Jacket

Allbirds

NWT Womens Medium Green Natural Run Mid Layer 1/4 Zip Jacket

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Merino wool blend (natural fiber)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic dye residue

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.