PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Burton Men's Cyclic GORE-TEX 2L Jacket

Burton · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Burton Men's Cyclic GORE-TEX 2L Jacket

Bad

Proceed with caution or GORE-TEX contains PFAS or Burton discloses nothing about alternatives.

Verdict · SkipGORE-TEX 2L jacket with inherent PFAS exposure; no major non-PFAS hazards reported. Presents lower concern with informed use and proper care.

GORE-TEX membranes are recognized as Teflon-family coating-based water-blocking materials historically reliant on PFAS chemistry. Burton hasn't disclosed whether this jacket uses legacy Teflon-type coating or newer low-PFAS variants.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

GORE-TEX 2L membrane (Teflon-family coating-based waterproof/breathable layer)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Burton Men's Cyclic GORE-TEX 2L Jacket is made of, ingredients and materials

The Burton Cyclic uses GORE-TEX 2L, a thin Teflon-family coating-based waterproof breathable membrane bonded to outer and inner fabric layers. GORE-TEX works by trapping water molecules while allowing water vapor through, which requires fluorochemical surfactants (PFAS) in manufacture and potentially in the finished fabric. The 2L designation means the membrane is laminated to the outer shell only, with a separate inner lining, making it lighter and more packable than 3L jackets but with slightly less durability on the membrane itself.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

GORE-TEX inherently contains or was manufactured with PFAS; trace residuals may remain in the finished jacket. Not quantified by Burton or the supplier.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
⏳

Thermal degradation of membrane

Prolonged exposure to heat above 80 degrees Celsius (e.g., near radiators, in hot cars) can degrade the Teflon-family coating and potentially release volatile degradation products. Normal wear and laundering with warm water present lower concern.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fabrics

Polyester outer shells and fleece liners can shed microfibers during washing. Washing the jacket infrequently and air drying (rather than machine wash and dry) minimizes shedding.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-releasing treatments are documented in Burton's GORE-TEX jackets, but some water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coatings can contain formaldehyde donors. Burton does not disclose the specific water-repellent coating finish used on the Cyclic.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Dye migration or azo dye use in outer shell

Burton does not publicly report azo dye use or testing for prohibited azo compounds. The outer shell color is typically achieved through standard textile dyes, which are not known to pose hazard in this product under normal wear.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Burton has not made public commitments to PFAS phase-out or disclosed PFAS content in their GORE-TEX products. The company does not market PFAS-free alternatives for hardshell jackets. Burton holds ISO 14001 environmental certification but this does not mandate PFAS disclosure. No major product recalls or chemical hazard controversies are documented for this specific model.

How it compares in its category

Most major ski jacket brands (The North Face, Arc'teryx, Patagonia, Salomon) use GORE-TEX for premium models, so the Cyclic is typical in this respect. Some brands now offer PFAS-free alternatives (Patagonia H2No, Helly Hansen HH water-repellent coating treatments), though GORE-TEX remains the performance standard. Burton's Cyclic is competitively positioned but does not differentiate on chemical transparency.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently with plain water or mild detergent designed for technical fabrics; do not machine wash or dry clean, as solvents and heat can degrade the membrane and may mobilize residual PFAS. Air dry completely before storage. The 2L membrane is durable but thinner than 3L; inspect seams and surface annually for peeling or delamination, which signals end of jacket life. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 65% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Burton has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Allbirds Jackets & Coats Allbirds Full Zip Wool Blend Puffer Jacket Women Size Small

Allbirds

Jackets & Coats Allbirds Full Zip Wool Blend Puffer Jacket Women Size Small

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Wool blend with synthetic fill (likely polyester)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Allbirds Jackets & Coats Allbirds Men's Trino Puffer Jacket Full Zip Wool Blend Forest Green Coat Size Sm

Allbirds

Jackets & Coats Allbirds Men's Trino Puffer Jacket Full Zip Wool Blend Forest Green Coat Size Sm

65GoodPFAS grade
  • wool blend (natural fiber dominant)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment - undisclosed chemistry

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Allbirds NWT Womens Medium Green Natural Run Mid Layer 1/4 Zip Jacket

Allbirds

NWT Womens Medium Green Natural Run Mid Layer 1/4 Zip Jacket

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Merino wool blend (natural fiber)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic dye residue

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.