PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Bumble and Bumble Bond Building Repair Shampoo

Bumble and bumble · Shampoo

Bumble and Bumble Bond Building Repair Shampoo

Excellent

Low-medium concern; no known PFAS triggers, but brand does not disclose formulation details.

Verdict: BuyAqueous shampoo with no established hazard reports; standard conditioning polymers pose minimal risk with normal use.

This rinse-off liquid cosmetic lacks surfactant treatments, waterproofing, or nonstick coatings that typically require PFAS. Bumble and bumble does not claim PFAS-free status or detail ingredients, leaving some formulation questions unanswered.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo with conditioning polymers

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed ingredients

Bumble and bumble does not list fragrance components; common shampoo fragrances (limonene, linalool, eugenol) can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Without full disclosure, individual risk cannot be quantified.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Many shampoos use DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, or diazolidinyl urea as preservatives; these release trace formaldehyde. Bumble and bumble formulation is not publicly available, so presence is unconfirmed.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Scalp sensitivity or irritation from polymer overload

High-molecular-weight conditioning polymers can accumulate on scalp with repeated use and cause itching or flaking in susceptible users. This is not a systemic hazard but a cosmetic-tolerance issue; clarifying shampoo use every 1-2 weeks mitigates buildup.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

1,4-dioxane contamination (manufacturing byproduct)

No specific testing or recalls reported for this product. Conditioning polymers used in shampoos are low-risk sources, but brand does not publish independent dioxane testing.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or regulatory findings on record. Luxury shampoos typically avoid lead or cadmium in pigments, but Bumble and bumble does not publicly verify this.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a water-based shampoo formulated with conditioning polymers (likely acrylates or cellulose derivatives) designed to repair and strengthen hair bonds. Aqueous shampoos are inherently lower-risk than powder or solvent-based alternatives because they lack volatile organic compounds and heating-driven release pathways. The 'bond-building' claim refers to chemical conditioning agents that coat and temporarily crosslink hair cuticles, not systemic absorption hazards.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bumble and bumble does not publish full ingredient decks or third-party certifications (e.g., EWG, Clean Beauty Project). The brand maintains silent stance on PFAS, fragrance sourcing, and heavy metal testing in pigments or colorants. No product recalls or regulatory actions are on record for this specific shampoo. Parent company Estee Lauder has faced scrutiny over fragrance transparency but not safety violations in hair care.

How it compares in its category

Repair shampoos in the luxury segment typically include polymeric film-formers and silicones; this product aligns with industry norms. Bumble and bumble's pricing and positioning suggest stricter raw material vetting than mass-market alternatives, though certification gaps make direct comparison difficult. Most professional salon shampoos at this price point lack public heavy-metal or formaldehyde-releaser testing data.

If you buy it

Use as directed (wet hair, lather, rinse thoroughly). No heat exposure required during application, so thermal degradation is not a concern. Store at room temperature away from sunlight to prevent polymer settling or separation. Discontinue if scalp irritation or unexplained hair breakage occurs and switch to fragrance-free or hypoallergenic alternatives to isolate cause.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bumble and bumble has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.