PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall57/ 100Good
Bumble and Bumble Hairdresser's Invisible Oil Shampoo

Bumble and bumble · Shampoo

Bumble and Bumble Hairdresser's Invisible Oil Shampoo

Excellent

Low-medium concern; standard shampoo lacks water-repellent treatment triggers for PFAS.

Verdict: BuyShampoo with no established heavy-metal, formaldehyde, or allergen hazards; PFAS profile typical for category; standard safety record.

This conventional liquid shampoo combines water, surfactants, silicones, and plant oils without water-repellent or stain-guard treatments. The brand has not disclosed PFAS policy, though the formulation presents low structural risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo with silicones and botanical oils

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Shampoo contains fragrance (listed as 'fragrance' or 'parfum' on full ingredient panels). Common fragrance constituents (limonene, linalool, geraniol) are known skin allergens in sensitive individuals; concentrate is low in rinse-off shampoos but reaction risk exists.

70/ 100
🏭

1,4-dioxane (manufacturing contaminant)

Ethoxylated surfactants (common in shampoos) can carry trace 1,4-dioxane from manufacturing. No specific testing of this product is published; risk is low but not zero in conventional formulations.

70/ 100
⚠️

Silicone buildup with long-term use

Heavy silicone shampoos can cause gradual product accumulation on hair if not stripped periodically with clarifying shampoo. This is a cosmetic concern (dullness, weight) rather than a safety hazard, but users report the need for monthly clarification.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No established reports of lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination in this product. Estee Lauder-owned brands typically comply with cosmetic heavy-metal limits, though no independent testing results are publicly available.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde releasers (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) are publicly listed in ingredient disclosures for this product. If present in trace amounts, they would be minimal and rinse off immediately.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is an aqueous shampoo base with added silicones (cyclomethicone, dimethicone) and botanical oils (camellia, coconut, argan, kelp). Silicones provide slip and shine without penetrating hair; they rinse out with surfactants and water. The botanical oils are emollient and reduce frizz. None of these ingredients require heat exposure during use, so volatilization hazards are minimal. The formula is designed as a rinse-off product, meaning residual concentrations on skin are very low.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bumble and bumble (owned by Estee Lauder) does not prominently publicize ingredient sourcing, heavy-metal testing, or formaldehyde-releaser screening on product labels or websites. No major recalls or safety actions are on record for this specific product. The brand does not market hypoallergenic or clean-beauty credentials, suggesting conventional cosmetic safety standards are the baseline. No third-party certifications (e.g., COSMOS, EWG Verified) are listed.

How it compares in its category

This shampoo is positioned as a premium salon product with silicone-heavy formulation, typical of professional haircare lines. Compared to mass-market shampoos, it carries no additional heavy-metal or chemical hazards; compared to sulfate-free or clean-beauty alternatives, it makes no restrictive ingredient claims and relies on conventional surfactants. The silicone load is higher than most, but silicones are not regulated as hazardous in rinse-off cosmetics by FDA or EU.

If you buy it

Use as directed: apply to wet hair, lather, and rinse thoroughly with water. No special precautions are needed for storage or application. If scalp irritation or contact dermatitis occurs, discontinue and consult a dermatologist; such reactions are rare but possible with any cosmetic. Keep out of eyes. Standard shelf life (typically 2-3 years unopened) applies; discard if visibly separated or odor changes.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bumble and bumble has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.