PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Bumble and Bumble Seaweed Shampoo

Bumble and bumble · Shampoo

Bumble and Bumble Seaweed Shampoo

Excellent

Low-medium concern; liquid cosmetics rarely need PFAS, though brand offers no verification.

Verdict: BuyWater-based shampoo with no established safety concerns; PFAS score adequate despite brand silence on testing.

This rinse-off liquid cosmetic contains no fluorinated coatings, waterproofing, or grease-resistant treatments typical of PFAS use. The brand makes no explicit PFAS claim, and no published lab data exists, but liquid shampoos do not typically require PFAS chemistry.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Water-based shampoo with seaweed extract

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Bumble and Bumble lists 'fragrance' as a single ingredient without component transparency. Fragrance blends in shampoos commonly contain limonene, linalool, or geraniol, which are established contact allergens; individual sensitivity varies widely and is not predictable from label.

70/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Seaweed can bioaccumulate lead, cadmium, and arsenic from marine environments. Cosmetic-grade seaweed extracts are not subject to heavy-metal limits in the US, and Bumble and Bumble does not disclose supplier sourcing or testing for this ingredient.

Source: FDA
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No published analysis confirms the use of formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., DMDM hydantoin) in this product. Standard rinse-off shampoo formulas typically use non-releasing systems, but ingredient lists do not always specify preservative type.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

1,4-dioxane (manufacturing contaminant)

This product formulation does not list ingredients that are direct sources of 1,4-dioxane (e.g., ethoxylated surfactants or PEG compounds are typical vectors). Without independent third-party testing disclosure, presence cannot be ruled out.

95/ 100

Microplastic microbeads

Bumble and Bumble Seaweed Shampoo is a liquid formula with no visible exfoliating particles; it is not formulated with plastic microbeads and complies with the US microbead ban.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Bumble and Bumble Seaweed Shampoo is a water-based liquid cleanser formulated with seaweed extract as its active botanical ingredient, plus standard detergent surfactants, preservatives, and fragrance. The seaweed content is primarily a conditioning and mineral-replenishment agent; it does not pose intrinsic toxicity risks at the concentrations used in rinse-off products. Liquid shampoos generally avoid the coating and adhesion hazards common in solid personal-care products, making ingredient volatilization or migration during storage minimal.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bumble and Bumble (owned by Estee Lauder) does not publish detailed PFAS testing data or transparent ingredient sourcing statements in publicly available materials; this silence is notable given the brand's premium positioning. The company is not known to have faced safety recalls or formal regulatory violations tied to this product. Estee Lauder has committed to phasing PFAS in some product lines, but product-level verification for this shampoo is absent from published sources.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream and luxury shampoos carry similar hazard profiles: fragrance sensitivizers and preservative systems are standard across the category. Bumble and Bumble's seaweed variant does not stand apart as either notably safer or riskier than mass-market botanical alternatives. The brand's price point reflects formulation quality and marketing rather than documented superior safety testing.

If you buy it

Shampoo is a rinse-off product with minimal skin-contact time, so hazard exposure is low regardless of formulation. Store in a cool, dry place to preserve preservative efficacy and avoid microbial growth. Discontinue use only if irritation develops; fragrance sensitivity is the primary individual-level risk. No special maintenance or replacement triggers apply beyond normal product degradation after opening (typically 6-12 months).

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bumble and bumble has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.