PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall57/ 100Good
Clinique UV Solutions Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 50

Clinique · Sunscreen

Clinique UV Solutions Hydrating Sunscreen SPF 50

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern; no waterproof coating technology present.

Verdict: BuyMineral sunscreen with transparent ingredient disclosure, no established safety red flags, lower PFAS risk profile.

Clinique's mineral sunscreen uses zinc oxide and titanium dioxide without disclosed water-repellent coatings. Standard formulation poses lower risk than water-resistant textiles or nonstick cookware.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Water-based emulsion, mineral sunscreen filters (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens / sensitizers

Clinique sunscreens typically contain fragrance compounds; no specific allergen data published for this formula, but mineral sunscreen users with sensitive skin should patch-test first.

70/ 100
💨

Nanoparticle inhalation risk (zinc oxide / titanium dioxide aerosolization)

Zinc oxide and titanium dioxide in sunscreen are typically micronized, not nano-scale, and are applied as lotion not powder; inhalation risk is negligible in lotion form but present in spray formulations (this product is not spray-based).

45/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation or photosensitivity from mineral filter interaction

Rare but documented in individuals with extremely sensitive skin or those using photosensitizing medications (retinoids, certain antibiotics); zinc oxide is generally considered the gentler choice vs. titanium dioxide.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
🧠

Lead

Zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are generally well-refined in cosmetic-grade formulations; no recalls or detectable contamination reported for Clinique mineral sunscreens. Impurity levels in pharmaceutical-grade minerals are regulated but not disclosed per product.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
🧼

Parabens

Clinique does not list restricted preservatives in standard formulations, but full preservative system is not always itemized on retail labels; dermatologically tested, no major sensitization incidents on record.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Clinique UV Solutions uses zinc oxide and/or titanium dioxide as active UV filters, which sit on skin as a physical barrier rather than absorbing into it. This water-based emulsion formula minimizes systemic absorption concerns that plague chemical sunscreens. The mineral filters are inert, non-allergenic for most users, and photostable, meaning they do not degrade significantly under sun exposure.

The brand's record and disclosure

Clinique (Estee Lauder group) publishes ingredient lists openly and has not faced major recalls or safety controversies tied to this sunscreen line. The brand does not make explicit PFAS-free claims on this product, but mineral sunscreens rarely require water-repellent coatings that introduce PFAS. No credible reports of undisclosed contaminants in this specific formula exist.

How it compares in its category

Mineral sunscreens like this occupy the safety mainstream for daily use; they avoid oxybenzone and avobenzone (chemical filters with absorption concerns) entirely. Compared to chemical alternatives, mineral formulas trade occasional whitecast for lower systemic risk. Price sits mid-to-premium; performance and stability are standard for the category.

If you buy it

Apply liberally (quarter-teaspoon for face) and reapply every two hours or after water contact; mineral filters do not migrate into skin during normal use. Store upright in a cool, dry place away from direct heat; zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are stable at room temperature indefinitely. Shake gently before use if separation occurs; this is normal in water-based emulsions and does not indicate degradation.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Clinique has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Sunscreen

Goddess Garden Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

Goddess Garden

Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz

mineral-based UV filters, plant-derived waxes

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or photosensitivity from plant oils

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern mineral sunscreen backed by credible PFAS-exclusion certification.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

Raw Elements

Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide in sunlight

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation or sensitivity to mineral film

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral sunscreen backed by third-party verification, no fluorochemical history.

MADE SAFE certifiedEWG Verified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Raw Elements Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

Raw Elements

Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30

mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), tin packaging

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
🍳

Epoxy resin coating in tin lining

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Nano particle inhalation from loose powder form

Limited concern

70

Low risk. Mineral formula plus explicit PFAS-free stance and certs lower concern.

MADE SAFE CertifiedReef Safe Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More sunscreen grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.