Clinique Dramatically Different Moisturizing Lotion+
Low PFAS risk; moisturizer lotion without water-repellent or nonstick treatments.
Clinique does not disclose PFAS status. Moisturizing lotions rarely contain PFAS unless formulated with water-repellent or silicone polymers; this product uses common emollients with lower typical concern.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
water, glycerin, oils, emollients
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Clinique Dramatically Different Lotion+ is made of, ingredients and materials
This lotion is formulated around water, glycerin, and botanical oils as its core hydrating agents, with emollients to soften skin. Unlike powder or pigmented products, liquid moisturizers with this composition carry no coating, pigment, or flame-retardant hazards. The absence of silicones, talc, or mineral fillers further reduces inhalation or heavy metal contamination risk. Glycerin and plant oils are skin-standard conditioning ingredients with established safety records in cosmetic use.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)
Clinique lists 'fragrance' without component breakdown. Fragrance mixes can include limonene, linalool, or other sensitizers; individual reactions are not predictable without full ingredient transparency.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Preservative efficacy and microbial growth
No recalls or contamination incidents on record for this product. Glycerin and water-based formulas require preservatives; Clinique uses standard cosmetic-grade systems. Risk is low if container remains sealed and unopened product is used within normal shelf life.
Heavy metals
Plant oils and glycerin can bioaccumulate heavy metals if sourced from contaminated regions. Clinique does not disclose metal testing; no regulatory findings or recalls suggest contamination, but independent verification is absent.
Source, FDA ↗Formaldehyde / VOCs
Clinique does not publicly list formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing agents (imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin) in this product. If present in minor amounts, exposure via skin absorption is minimal; no reported cases link this lotion to formaldehyde sensitization.
Source, ATSDR ↗Talc or asbestos contamination
This lotion is talc-free by formulation type (liquid, not powder). No talc or silicate minerals are listed or implied in the water-oil-glycerin base.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Clinique (Estee Lauder subsidiary) does not publicly disclose detailed formulation safety testing or PFAS stance, though the parent company has made industry-standard sustainability commitments. No specific recalls or regulatory actions on this product line are on record. Estee Lauder brands comply with FDA cosmetic ingredient restrictions and EU bans, but transparency on heavy metals testing, fragrance composition, or preservative safety is limited compared to indie or certified brands. The brand's silence on PFAS and ingredient sourcing reflects industry norm rather than a red flag.
How it compares in its category
This formula is typical of premium prestige moisturizers, water and glycerin base with added emollients and fragrance. It carries similar ingredient profiles to Clinique competitors (Estee Lauder Advanced Night Repair, Shiseido Benefiance) and mass-market alternatives (Cetaphil, CeraVe). Unlike mineral or physical sunscreens, this lotion requires no titanium dioxide or iron oxide scrutiny. Compared to moisturizers with silicones, talc, or mica, this formulation avoids those potential inhalation exposures, placing it in the lower-concern tier for cosmetic moisturizers.
If you buy it
Store at room temperature away from direct heat; glycerin-based formulas can degrade or separate if overheated. Use within 12 months of opening to minimize preservative breakdown and microbial growth risk. If you develop rash, irritation, or respiratory reaction after application, discontinue and check fragrance allergen sensitivity (unspecified fragrance compounds are the primary irritant risk in this formula). No special maintenance required; standard closed-container storage prevents contamination.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Clinique has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Clinique Dramatically Different Moisturizing Lotion+?
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Lead
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More cosmetics grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.