Clinique For Men Maximum Hydrator 72-Hour Auto-Replenishing Hydrator
Insufficient public disclosure on PFAS; contact Clinique for assurance.
Clinique does not publicly disclose PFAS status for this moisturizer. Skincare creams typically pose lower risk than treated textiles or coatings, but ingredient transparency is limited without direct manufacturer confirmation.
The better-graded swap
Bare Minerals
bareMinerals Mineral Makeup
100/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Water, glycerin, emollients, humectants in cream formulation
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Clinique For Men Maximum Hydrator is made of, ingredients and materials
This is a water-based cream containing glycerin (humectant), emollients, and thickeners typical of moisturizers. The formulation is unlikely to contain volatile organic compounds at levels of concern in finished product, since it is applied topically in small amounts and not heated during use. No hazardous resins, azo dyes, or antimony compounds are relevant to this product class. The cream's stability and potential for bacterial contamination depend on preservative systems and container design.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
1,4-dioxane (solvent impurity)
Cosmetic creams may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct in ethoxylated emulsifiers or preservatives. Clinique does not publicly disclose testing for this contaminant in this product; no recall or concern on record for this specific line.
Fragrance allergen disclosure
Product likely contains fragrance compounds that may trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Clinique does not itemize fragrance components on label; full ingredient declaration available on request from brand.
What’s reassuring
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Clinique formulations typically use modern preservative systems (phenoxyethanol, methylisothiazolinone) rather than formaldehyde-releasers. No established record of formaldehyde releasers in this product or brand line.
Source, ATSDR ↗Talc contamination
This is a liquid cream, not a powder; talc is not a typical ingredient in water-based moisturizers and is not on record in this formulation.
Heavy metals
Male moisturizers are minimally pigmented or colorless; heavy-metal contamination in colorants is not a documented concern for this product type or brand.
Source, FDA ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Clinique is owned by Estee Lauder and maintains certification under the Estee Lauder Companies ingredient disclosure initiatives. The brand has not faced major recalls or established controversies specific to this product line. However, Clinique's public stance on PFAS in cosmetics is silent, meaning the company does not publicly commit to PFAS-free formulations or transparency. Consumers seeking PFAS assurance should contact Clinique directly, as third-party verification is not on record for this specific product.
How it compares in its category
Male-targeted moisturizers in this price tier typically use similar water-glycerin-emollient bases. Clinique's inclusion of established brand reputation and dermatological testing provides some assurance of ingredient quality control compared to unbranded alternatives. However, many competitors now publish PFAS and forever-chemical pledges, making Clinique's silence a relative transparency disadvantage. The 72-hour hydration claim is marketing; actual performance depends on individual skin and reapplication habits.
If you buy it
Apply as directed on clean skin; no special precautions required for topical use. Store away from direct heat and sunlight to preserve emollient stability. Discard if the product separates, develops odor, or shows visible mold, as these indicate preservative breakdown. If you have sensitive skin or fragrance allergies, patch-test first; request full ingredient list and fragrance components from Clinique if concerned about specific allergens.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Clinique has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Clinique For Men Maximum Hydrator 72-Hour Auto-Replenishing Hydrator?
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Lead
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Fragrance allergens and essential oils
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More cosmetics grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.