PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Clinique Moisture Surge Intense 72H Lipid-Replenishing Moisturizer

Clinique · Cosmetics

Clinique Moisture Surge Intense 72H Lipid-Replenishing Moisturizer

Excellent

Lower concern cosmetic; no known PFAS-typical uses. Brand silent on PFAS.

Verdict · BuyWater-based moisturizer with no established hazards on record; PFAS lower concern; Clinique has routine cosmetic safety compliance.

Moisturizer formulated from typical skincare ingredients without water-repellent or stain-resistant treatments that typically require PFAS. Clinique has not disclosed PFAS policy for this product.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

water, humectants, emollients, preservatives

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Clinique Moisture Surge Moisturizer is made of, ingredients and materials

This is a water-based emulsion combining humectants (likely glycerin or hyaluronic acid) to draw moisture into skin, emollients (oils or silicones) to seal it in, and preservatives to prevent microbial growth. The 72H claim refers to humectant performance, not durability of the product itself. Emulsifiers hold water and oil together; none of these ingredient classes are inherently hazardous at cosmetic-use concentrations, though individual preservatives vary in irritation potential.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Product is not labeled fragrance-free; typical cosmetic fragrances contain mix of essential oils and synthetic compounds that trigger contact dermatitis or respiratory sensitivity in some users. Specific allergens not disclosed in standard ingredient lists.

70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane contamination

Water-based emulsions can contain 1,4-dioxane as a processing byproduct in certain surfactants or emulsifiers, though concentrations are usually below regulatory concern thresholds. No specific test data for this product is on public record.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public record indicates this product uses formaldehyde or imidazolidinyl/diazolidinyl urea releasers. Modern Clinique formulations typically use paraben or phenoxyethanol systems, but full preservative identity is proprietary.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

This moisturizer is not a pigmented cosmetic (not a color product); heavy metal contamination is not a typical hazard class for unpigmented creams.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Talc contamination

This is a liquid/cream moisturizer, not a powder product; talc is not an ingredient class relevant to this formulation type.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Clinique is owned by Estée Lauder and routinely discloses ingredients on packaging and online. The brand complies with FDA cosmetic regulations and EU restrictions; no major recalls or contamination incidents are on record for this product line. Clinique does not voluntarily disclose PFAS absence or testing; their silence reflects typical industry practice rather than evasion.

How it compares in its category

Water-based moisturizers are among the lowest-hazard cosmetic formats; they avoid high concentrations of volatile solvents or powder minerals. This product sits in the mainstream prestige segment, similar in formulation strategy to CeraVe, Neutrogena, and Olay variants. Fragrance-free or lightly fragranced options carry lower sensitization risk than heavily scented creams.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight to prevent emulsion breakdown or preservative degradation. Do not mix with other products in the jar; use a clean applicator each time to avoid introducing bacteria. Replace within 12 months of opening or if the texture separates, smells sour, or shows discoloration. Discontinue if unexplained skin irritation develops.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Clinique has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Clinique Moisture Surge Intense 72H Lipid-Replenishing Moisturizer?

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup

Bare Minerals

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Lead

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More cosmetics grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.