Colgate Total Dental Floss, Mint Flavor, Travel Size 3 Yards, Waxed Glide Floss for Plaque Removal Between Teeth and Along Gumline, Compact Pocket
Lower concern, yet brand transparency on PFAS is missing.
Standard waxed nylon floss doesn't typically require PFAS, and no red flags exist. The brand hasn't disclosed its PFAS stance or testing.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
Nylon floss with wax coating
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Colgate Total Dental Floss Compact Pocket is made of, ingredients and materials
Colgate Total Dental Floss is nylon filament coated with wax (composition unspecified by Colgate, typically paraffin or beeswax). Nylon is a synthetic polymer chosen for strength and glide; the wax reduces friction and helps the floss slip between teeth without shredding. No adhesives, plasticizers, or reactive compounds are typically present in basic dental floss formulations, making the material profile straightforward and low-risk during normal oral use.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Nylon degradation and microplastic generation
Nylon fibers can shed microscopic particles during aggressive flossing. Ingestion of these particles occurs naturally but cumulative exposure over years remains unstudied in humans; the practical significance is unknown but represents a non-zero environmental and physiological exposure route.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Wax composition and purity
Colgate does not disclose whether wax coating is food-grade or pharmaceutical-grade paraffin, beeswax, or a blend. No contaminant testing or impurity reports are publicly available for this product line, but nylon floss wax is swallowed in minute quantities during normal use and poses minimal acute risk.
Mint flavoring agents
Mint flavoring compound is not specified. Natural or synthetic menthol and other flavor oils are standard in dental floss and are not designated as hazardous in oral care products; allergic sensitization is rare but possible in individuals with specific fragrance sensitivities.
Bacterial colonization of floss material
Nylon and wax are not known substrates for pathogenic biofilm growth during single-use application. Reusing floss (not recommended) or storing damp floss increases mold and bacterial risk, but this reflects misuse, not product design.
Gum trauma from improper use
Floss itself carries no chemical hazard, but mechanical injury to gums is user-dependent. Aggressive insertion, excessive pressure, or pre-existing gum disease can cause bleeding or recession; this is a technique issue, not a material safety issue.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Colgate does not publish detailed material safety data sheets or ingredient sourcing for dental floss products. The brand has faced recalls on other oral care products (notably toothpaste in certain markets for microbial contamination) but no documented safety recalls on this floss line. Colgate maintains ISO and FDA compliance certifications for dental products but offers no third-party testing transparency specific to floss formulations.
How it compares in its category
Waxed nylon floss is the most common category segment globally and is considered a commodity product with minimal differentiation in safety profile. Alternatives include unwaxed nylon, silk, and plant-based fibers; none carry established safety advantages over waxed nylon for typical users. Colgate's travel size and mint flavoring are convenience features, not safety considerations, and fall within standard formulation ranges for major brands.
If you buy it
Use as directed, unwind 12-18 inches, wrap around fingers, and guide gently between teeth using a sawing motion. Mint flavoring is cosmetic and poses no ingestion risk in normal use; discard floss after single use and do not reuse. Replace the 3-yard travel pack when depleted; no storage precautions beyond keeping dry are needed. If gums bleed excessively or become inflamed, consult a dentist, as this reflects technique or gum health, not product defect.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Colgate has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Colgate Total Dental Floss, Mint Flavor, Travel Size 3 Yards, Waxed Glide Floss for Plaque Removal Between Teeth and Along Gumline, Compact Pocket?
- Plant-based waxed fiber floss
- A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
- Fragrance allergens and sensitizers
- nylon monofilament
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Microplastics
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- Coconut fiber-based floss
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Microbial growth in natural fiber storage
More dental floss grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.