PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall57/ 100Good
2 in 1 Shampoo & Conditioner

Credo Beauty · Shampoo

2 in 1 Shampoo & Conditioner

Excellent

Lower concern; liquid cosmetics rarely need PFAS, but brand silence limits certainty.

Verdict: BuyCredo-certified liquid cosmetic with low hazard profile; no established contamination issues; PFAS silence is typical for this product type.

Standard shampoo-conditioner formulas don't typically require fluorinated compounds for their core function. Without third-party testing or explicit PFAS-free certification, some residual contamination risk remains.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo/conditioner base (typical surfactants, humectants, silicones)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Liquid shampoos typically list 'fragrance' as a single ingredient rather than disclosing individual aromatic compounds; sensitive individuals may react to unlisted allergens such as limonene or linalool. Credo's vetting reduces but does not eliminate this risk.

70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (preservative contamination)

Liquid cosmetics relying on ethoxylated surfactants or certain preservative systems may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as an unintended byproduct. No testing data for this specific product is publicly available; risk is typical across the category rather than brand-specific.

70/ 100
⚠️

Silicone accumulation (cosmetic concern, not acute toxicity)

The silicone conditioning agents in 2-in-1 formulas can build up on hair and scalp with prolonged use, reducing volume and causing dullness; this is a cosmetic effect, not a health hazard. Periodic clarifying rinses prevent buildup.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Credo's clean certification excludes formaldehyde and known releaser chemicals, making this hazard unlikely in this product. Standard preservation likely relies on safer alternatives such as sodium benzoate or phenoxyethanol.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Liquid shampoos typically rely on synthetic dyes or mineral opacifiers rather than pigments carrying lead or cadmium; Credo's ingredient vetting specifically screens for heavy metal contaminants. No record of contamination in Credo shampoos.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a water-based liquid shampoo/conditioner combining anionic surfactants (primary cleansers), silicones (conditioning/slip), humectants (moisture), and preservatives in an aqueous matrix. Unlike bar soaps or powders, liquid formulations are inherently lower-risk for volatile organic compound off-gassing and typically do not require PFAS water/oil repellents. The silicone content (common in 2-in-1 products) is non-toxic but can accumulate on hair over repeated use, which is cosmetic rather than safety-related.

The brand's record and disclosure

Credo Beauty is a curated beauty retailer emphasizing clean formulations and holds brands to ingredient transparency standards; products sold carry Credo's "clean" certification, which excludes known carcinogens, endocrine disruptors, and heavy metals. However, the brand has not publicly disclosed specific PFAS testing or stance for this product line. No recalls or safety warnings for Credo shampoos are on record. The absence of public PFAS commitment is common among mainstream beauty brands, even those with strong ingredient screening.

How it compares in its category

Liquid 2-in-1 shampoo/conditioners are among the lowest-risk personal care products; they avoid particulate talc, spray inhalation hazards, and the heavy metal pigment risks of colored cosmetics. This product sits in the 'clean beauty' tier of its category, meaning stricter vetting than mass-market alternatives. Compared to budget shampoos, it carries lower likelihood of unlisted fragrance allergens or undisclosed preservative loads, though efficacy claims are not safety indicators.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve preservative efficacy and prevent bacterial growth; use within 12 months of opening. Discontinue if scalp irritation, redness, or itching develops, as fragrance or preservative sensitivity can occur. This product is not designed for use on injured or broken scalp skin. No special heating or application precautions apply; standard rinse with water is sufficient.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Credo Beauty has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.