PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Cecred Hydrating Shampoo

Credo Beauty · Shampoo

Cecred Hydrating Shampoo

Excellent

Lower-concern product; PFAS risk is minimal in rinse-off shampoo form.

Verdict: BuyWater-based rinse-off shampoo with minimal established hazard profile; Credo Beauty brand carries clean beauty positioning; no major recalls or safety alerts on record.

This rinse-off liquid requires no PFAS-prone ingredients or manufacturing steps. The brand makes no PFAS disclosure, but rinse-off formats bioaccumulate less than leave-on products.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Water-based shampoo formulation, likely surfactants and conditioning agents

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens (botanicals or synthetic)

Hydrating shampoos often contain fragrance or botanical extracts for sensory appeal. While Credo Beauty screens for major allergens, individual sensitivity to limonene, linalool, or botanical oils can trigger contact dermatitis on scalp; this is product-specific sensitivity, not a manufacturing defect.

70/ 100
🏭

1,4-dioxane (manufacturing byproduct)

Water-based shampoos can retain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of ethoxylation (surfactant processing), though levels are typically negligible and below EPA concern thresholds. Third-party testing is not standard for rinse-off cosmetics, so presence cannot be ruled out without independent analysis.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No evidence of formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) in Cecred or typical Credo Beauty products; clean beauty positioning usually excludes these. If present, they would be disclosed on ingredient labels.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Hydrating shampoos typically do not contain exfoliating microbeads; plastic microbeads are more common in scrubs and body washes. Cecred is unlikely to include them given clean beauty positioning.

Source: EPA
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Clear or lightly tinted shampoos pose minimal heavy metal risk. Credo Beauty's vetting process typically excludes pigments with lead or cadmium contamination, though no independent third-party testing results are publicly available for this specific product.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Cecred Hydrating Shampoo is a water-based formulation typical of modern shampoos, built around surfactants (cleansing agents) and conditioning polymers or oils. The 'hydrating' positioning suggests humectants and emollients rather than heavy silicones. As a rinse-off product applied briefly to scalp and hair then washed away, systemic absorption risk is inherently low compared to leave-on products like conditioners or serums.

The brand's record and disclosure

Credo Beauty is a curated retailer and private-label brand focused on clean beauty standards. The brand screens products for harmful ingredients and maintains transparency about certifications (often organic or clean beauty standards), though specific formulation disclosures for this shampoo are not prominently published. No recalls or safety alerts for Cecred or Credo Beauty products are documented in public safety databases. The brand's 'silent' stance on PFAS reflects broader industry practice for cosmetics rather than a red flag.

How it compares in its category

Cecred Hydrating Shampoo sits in the premium natural/clean beauty shampoo segment, where ingredient scrutiny is standard. Most competitors in this tier (e.g., Briogeo, Moroccanoil, SheaMoisture premium lines) similarly avoid flagged surfactants and heavy synthetics. Water-based hydrating shampoos as a category carry fewer hazards than volumizing or clarifying formulas, which may include harsher anionic surfactants or chelating agents.

If you buy it

Use as directed on damp hair, lather, and rinse thoroughly. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve preservative efficacy and prevent mold growth in the bottle. Rinse-off products like shampoo pose minimal exposure risk; discontinue use only if scalp irritation or allergic contact dermatitis develops (rare but possible with fragrance or botanical extracts in sensitive individuals). Replace when empty; shelf life is typically 18-36 months unopened.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Credo Beauty has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.