PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Everlane Perform Pocket Legging

Everlane · Activewear

Everlane Perform Pocket Legging

Bad

Skip until Everlane clarifies water-repellent coating treatment chemistry

Verdict: SkipPFAS water-repellent coating is primary concern; nylon blend itself low-risk if cared for properly. Monitor Everlane's water-repellent coating transparency before repurchasing.

Everlane's Perform leggings use nylon with likely water-resistant finish but provide no PFAS transparency. No third-party verification available; brand silent on treatment specifics.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon blend with water-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) fluorochemical composition

Everlane has not disclosed whether this legging uses legacy PFOA/PFOS, other long-chain fluorochemicals, or fluorine-free water-repellent coating. Industry sources confirm many nylon athletic products still use fluorinated treatments. Without transparency, purchaser cannot assess individual risk.

45/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in synthetic fabrics

Nylon textiles may be dyed with azo colorants that can degrade to aromatic amines under wear stress or sweat. Everlane does not certify to OEKO-TEX Standard 100, which would screen for restricted azo dyes. Black and deeply colored leggings carry higher theoretical risk than light colors.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Wrinkle-resistant, water-resistant, and stretch-recovery finishes on synthetic blends sometimes use formaldehyde-releasing resins. Everlane's finish chemistry is undisclosed. Off-gassing from formaldehyde is typically minimal in performance fabrics but possible in poorly cured finishes.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding from nylon blend

Nylon garments shed microfibers during washing, contributing to synthetic particle pollution; this is not a direct wearer health hazard but an environmental concern relevant to lifecycle assessment. Washing in a microfiber filter bag reduces shedding by 80-90%.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Antimony in polyester components (if present)

If the blend includes polyester (not confirmed in available Everlane specifications), antimony trioxide catalyst residues are theoretically possible but exceedingly rare in finished garments and not reported in this brand's products.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Everlane Perform Pocket Leggings are nylon-blend fabric with a water-resistant (water-repellent coating) treatment applied to the surface. Nylon itself is a stable synthetic polymer with no established leaching hazards under normal wear. The water-resistant finish is the material concern: water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on long-chain PFOA/PFOS (now largely phased out), but many brands still use other fluorochemicals with unknown long-term health profiles. Everlane has not publicly disclosed which specific water-repellent coating chemistry they use in this product.

The brand's record and disclosure

Everlane markets itself as a transparency-focused brand, yet has remained silent on water-repellent coating chemical composition in their technical fabrics despite industry-wide scrutiny of PFAS in apparel since 2015. The company has not earned certification from OEKO-TEX, BLUESIGN, or other textile safety standards that would mandate chemical disclosure. No major recalls or contamination reports are on record for Everlane apparel, but the absence of disclosure makes independent verification impossible.

How it compares in its category

Performance leggings with water resistance are common in athletic wear; most brands either use PFAS-based water-repellent coating (cheaper), transition to fluorine-free alternatives (Patagonia, some Lululemon lines), or eliminate water resistance entirely. Everlane's silence is worse than competitors who explicitly state their chemistry or certify to standards. Brands like Girlfriend Collective and Alo Yoga provide greater transparency on textile treatments, though availability varies by style.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cold water before first wear to reduce any surface finish residues. Avoid high-heat drying or direct heat exposure, which can theoretically degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially release volatile compounds. Expect the water-resistant treatment to diminish after 20-30 washes; do not attempt to reapply fluorochemical finishes at home. Request Everlane's safety data sheet (SDS) or water-repellent coating treatment documentation before purchase if PFAS exposure is a concern for you.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Everlane has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Activewear

Fabletics Women's Oasis PureLuxe High-Waisted Pocketed Kick Flare

Fabletics

Women's Oasis PureLuxe High-Waisted Pocketed Kick Flare

polyester blend fabric, standard construction

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade47Poor
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microfiber shedding from synthetic blend

Moderate concern

45

Lower concern. Unsupported fabric unlikely to carry high PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Fabletics Women's Live-In High-Waisted Leggings

Fabletics

Women's Live-In High-Waisted Leggings

Polyester/nylon blend, standard athletic apparel

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade43Poor
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Limited concern

70
🧴

Phthalate plasticizers in elastane/spandex

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microfiber shedding

Moderate concern

45

Lower concern. Standard athletic leggings without water-repellent coating.

Risky category by default

Fabletics Women's Define PowerHold High-Waisted 7/8 Leggings

Fabletics

Women's Define PowerHold High-Waisted 7/8 Leggings

polyester/nylon blend with elastic

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade43Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes and colorfast quality

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Elastic degradation and allergenic contact

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; basic synthetic athletic wear without known PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

More activewear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.