PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Function of Beauty Customizable Haircare for Coily Hair - Repair, Hydrate & Define Curls with Vegan, Gluten-Free Shampoo & Conditioner

Function of Beauty · Shampoo

Function of Beauty Customizable Haircare for Coily Hair - Repair, Hydrate & Define Curls with Vegan, Gluten-Free Shampoo & Conditioner

Excellent

Lower concern for PFAS. Typical rinse-off haircare with no water-resistant or waterproofing triggers.

Verdict: BuyRinse-off haircare with no established hazards; vegan formulation and lower PFAS concern support purchase with standard practice.

These liquid cosmetics have no known Teflon-family coating coatings, water-repellent treatments, or nonstick surfaces that are main PFAS vectors. The brand makes no PFAS claims and provides no third-party testing data. Standard cosmetic formulations carry lower inherent PFAS risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous solution (shampoo/conditioner); typical cosmetic surfactants, humectants, conditioning agents

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Rinse-off haircare frequently contains preservatives such as DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, or diazolidinyl urea, which slowly release trace formaldehyde to prevent bacterial and fungal growth. Exposure during brief shampooing is minimal and well below dermal irritation thresholds; no public data on this product's specific preservative system.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergen sensitization

Shampoos marketed for coily hair often contain fragrance blends (parfum) with essential oils or synthetic musks that can trigger contact dermatitis or scalp sensitization in susceptible individuals, particularly with repeated exposure. Function of Beauty's ingredient transparency should allow pre-purchase review; patch testing on inner arm is recommended for users with sensitive scalp.

70/ 100

Microbial contamination from improper storage or preservation breakdown

Any aqueous personal-care product is vulnerable to bacterial or mold growth if stored in warm, humid conditions or if preservative system degrades over time. This risk is product-agnostic and managed by the user through cool storage and timely replacement; no specific formulation failure is on record for this brand.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Shampoos are not typically pigmented or pearlescent and thus do not require colorants or mica likely to harbor cadmium or lead. No evidence that Function of Beauty formulations contain these additives; rinse-off nature limits any exposure window.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

1,4-dioxane contamination from surfactant or emulsifier synthesis

1,4-dioxane is a byproduct of ethoxylation (production of common surfactants like sodium laureth sulfate); the FDA allows trace residues in cosmetics. Function of Beauty has not published 1,4-dioxane testing results, and no regulatory action documents the presence of elevated levels; contamination is not established for this product.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Function of Beauty's shampoo and conditioner are aqueous solutions containing surfactants (detergents), humectants (glycerin, panthenol), and conditioning polymers typical of mainstream haircare. The product is formulated as rinse-off cosmetics, meaning exposure duration is brief and most ingredients wash away without absorption or retention on skin. Vegan formulation signals exclusion of animal-derived proteins and lanolin, replacing them with plant-based or synthetic alternatives; gluten-free labeling appeals to scalp-sensitive consumers but carries no direct safety implication for non-celiac users.

The brand's record and disclosure

Function of Beauty markets customizable haircare with emphasis on ingredient transparency but has not published detailed PFAS or heavy-metal testing data publicly. The brand holds no third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny) on record. No significant recalls or regulatory actions against this product line have been documented. Ingredient lists are available online, enabling independent review, but the brand's silence on PFAS testing is typical of mid-market haircare and does not indicate contamination, only lack of voluntary disclosure.

How it compares in its category

Rinse-off shampoos and conditioners carry inherently lower risk than leave-on products because contact time is measured in minutes and residue is minimal. Function of Beauty's vegan positioning aligns with consumer demand but does not confer safety advantages over conventional formulas; both may contain identical surfactants and polymers. Customization (ingredient selection) is a marketing feature that does not alter the fundamental safety profile of individual components. Compared to drugstore brands, Function of Beauty's transparency on ingredient sourcing is competitive but unremarkable.

If you buy it

Use as directed: wet hair, apply small amount, massage scalp briefly, rinse thoroughly with water. No heat or prolonged contact is required; standard shampooing poses no elevated risk. Discontinue if scalp rash, itching, or irritation develops within one week, as allergic response to fragrance, botanical extracts, or preservatives can occur in sensitive individuals. Store in cool, dry conditions and replace when product separates, discolors, or odor changes, indicating microbial growth or ingredient degradation (typical shelf life 12-24 months unopened).

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Function of Beauty has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.