PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Garnier Fructis Hair Filler Strength Repair Shampoo

Garnier Fructis · Shampoo

Garnier Fructis Hair Filler Strength Repair Shampoo

Excellent

Lower concern for typical shampoo, though no testing confirms PFAS absence.

Verdict · BuyStandard shampoo with no established safety issues; typical surfactant and polymer formulation poses minimal hazard when used as directed.

This aqueous shampoo lacks water-repellent, stain-resistant, or nonstick functions where PFAS would be used. Garnier makes no PFAS claims and no public lab data exists.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo base (surfactants, water, glycerin, polymers)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Garnier Fructis Hair Filler Repair Shampoo is made of, ingredients and materials

Garnier Fructis Hair Filler Strength Repair Shampoo is a aqueous surfactant-based cleanser containing water, anionic and amphoteric detergents, glycerin humectant, and film-forming polymers (likely acrylates or polyquaterniums) to coat and strengthen hair. The 'filler' claim refers to resin polymers that temporarily thicken the hair shaft; these are not absorbed systemically and rinse away after shampooing. No exotic or flagged ingredients appear in publicly available formulations; the product relies on mainstream commodity chemistry.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Garnier Fructis formulations contain fragrance (typically listed as 'perfume' or 'fragrance'), which may trigger contact dermatitis or sensitization in individuals with fragrance sensitivity. No specific allergen disclosure is published; this is a category-wide concern for scented shampoos.

70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane contamination

Anionic surfactants and ethoxylated ingredients (common in this shampoo class) may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct. No independent testing of this specific product is publicly available; industry-wide surveys suggest low but non-zero residues in mainstream shampoos.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No preservatives known to release formaldehyde (e.g.DMDM hydantoin and imidazolidinyl urea appear in standard Garnier Fructis formulations; modern formulations typically use preservative systems like methylisothiazolinone or phenoxyethanol with lower concern for certain hazards.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

This shampoo contains no documented microbeads or solid plastic particles; film-forming polymers (acrylates, polyquaterniums) are soluble/suspension systems, not microplastics. Garnier phased out plastic microbeads in response to regulatory bans (EU 2020, US 2015).

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Garnier Fructis uses approved FD&C and CI colorants; no tin-based or antimony-bearing opacifiers are typical in modern shampoo formulations. No recalls or detected contamination for this product line exist in public records.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Garnier (L'Oreal subsidiary) provides ingredient lists but does not publish independent third-party safety testing or certifications (e.g., no EWG Verified, dermatologist-confirmed, or fragrance transparency pledges). The brand has no documented recalls or regulatory warnings specific to this shampoo line. L'Oreal has faced historical scrutiny over microplastic claims and fragrance opacity, but Garnier itself maintains a low-controversy profile in safety databases.

How it compares in its category

This shampoo is formulaically typical for mass-market strengthening shampoos, surfactant-polymer blends are industry standard. Compared to premium or 'clean' brands (e.g., Burt's Bees, SheaMoisture), Garnier Fructis does not emphasize ingredient sourcing or transparency; compared to budget lines, it includes more sophisticated polymer technology. It sits squarely in the middle-tier convenience segment with no material safety advantage or disadvantage over peers.

If you buy it

Use as directed on damp hair; no special precautions needed. Avoid contact with eyes (standard for all shampoos). If used on sensitive scalp or with prior allergic reactions to fragrances, patch-test first or consider fragrance-free alternatives. No heat exposure or storage concerns apply; store in a cool, dry place and use within 3 years of manufacture for optimal stability.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Garnier Fructis has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More shampoo grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.