PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall57/ 100Good
Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine Fortifying Shampoo

Garnier Fructis · Shampoo

Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine Fortifying Shampoo

Excellent

Lower concern for standard liquid shampoo with no PFAS-associated treatments.

Verdict: BuyStandard aqueous shampoo with no established safety red flags; low PFAS concern; suitable for routine use with normal precautions.

This water-based liquid shampoo lacks water-repellent or stain-resistant coatings that would introduce PFAS. Garnier doesn't disclose PFAS status, though the formulation type carries minimal inherent risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo (no PFAS-indicator coating or treatment)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (synthetic contaminant)

1,4-dioxane is a known contaminant in shampoos resulting from ethoxylation of surfactants during manufacture, not a deliberate additive. FDA does not regulate it as a cosmetic ingredient but notes it as a probable carcinogen; Garnier does not disclose testing or removal steps for this product.

70/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed compounds

Shampoos list 'fragrance' or 'parfum' as single ingredients while concealing dozens of aroma chemicals; some individuals report scalp sensitization. Garnier Fructis does not itemize fragrance constituents, and no third-party analysis of this specific product's fragrance load is publicly available.

70/ 100
🎨

Preservative-related irritation (phenoxyethanol, methylisothiazolinone)

Standard shampoo preservatives prevent microbial growth but are known contact allergens in sensitive individuals. Product formulation varies by region; some versions contain MI (methylisothiazolinone), flagged by dermatologists as a rising cause of scalp dermatitis.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No published recalls or independent testing of Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine for lead, cadmium, or arsenic. Liquid shampoos carry lower inherent risk than pigmented cosmetics (e.g., eyeshadow, powders) for metal contamination.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Imidazolidinyl and dmdm hydantoin (formaldehyde releasers) are banned or restricted in EU cosmetics but remain permitted in US shampoos. No evidence this product contains these; Garnier does not disclose its preservative system publicly for this SKU.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Garnier Fructis Sleek & Shine is a water-based liquid shampoo formulated with surfactants (cleaning agents), conditioning polymers, and fruit-derived marketing ingredients. The primary risk category for liquid shampoos is preservatives and fragrance components, not structural materials. As an aqueous product with no water-repellent or non-stick coatings, it carries none of the Teflon-type coating or ceramic-coating hazards typical of cookware or treated textiles.

The brand's record and disclosure

Garnier (L'Oreal subsidiary) does not publish explicit PFAS-free certifications for this line and makes no public disclosure of PFAS testing or avoidance policy. The brand has faced no major recalls or safety controversies specific to Fructis shampoos in recent years. Independent safety databases (EWG, CosmeticsInfo) list no flagged ingredients in the standard formulation, though ingredient lists vary by region and reformulation.

How it compares in its category

Garnier Fructis occupies the mass-market segment; it is comparable in transparency and hazard profile to competitors like Pantene and Dove. It lacks third-party certifications (organic, EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny) that some consumers prioritize. For a standard drugstore shampoo, safety and formulation stability are unremarkable and pose no known differential risk versus major branded alternatives.

If you buy it

Store away from extreme heat and direct sunlight to preserve formula stability. Shake before use as surfactants may separate over time. Discontinue if scalp irritation develops; fragrance and preservatives are the likeliest culprits. Replace every 12-18 months after opening to minimize preservative degradation and bacterial colonization in the bottle.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Garnier Fructis has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.