PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall14/ 100Bad
Ralyn Aquatec Waterproof Shoe Protector

Ralyn · Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

Ralyn Aquatec Waterproof Shoe Protector

Poor

Skip this product due to unknown waterproof coating chemicals.

Verdict · SkipUnknown waterproof coating chemistry and PFAS risk warrant caution; use sparingly, ensure ventilation during application, monitor for respiratory irritation.

This shoe protector spray has no disclosed waterproofing chemistry. Waterproof treatments usually rely on fluorochemicals, but Gecko won't confirm either way.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Unspecified waterproof coating on shoe protector spray/treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Ralyn Aquatec Waterproof Shoe Protector is made of, ingredients and materials

Ralyn Aquatec is a spray-applied waterproof treatment for shoes, but the manufacturer does not publicly disclose the active waterproofing agent or solvent system. Waterproof coatings on textiles and leather are commonly formulated with either fluorochemical-based compounds (PFAS-containing) or non-fluorinated alternatives like silicone or polyurethane. Without ingredient transparency, the coating chemistry cannot be independently assessed for safety.

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
💨

Solvent inhalation and respiratory irritation

Spray-applied coatings typically contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as propellants or solvents. Without ingredient disclosure, users cannot identify specific respiratory sensitizers; inhalation during or immediately after application poses risk of coughing, throat irritation, or asthma exacerbation in sensitive individuals.

20/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Fluorochemical water repellents have dominated the shoe treatment market historically. Gecko's silence on whether the coating is fluorinated or fluorine-free, combined with the product's 20/100 PFAS safety grade, suggests non-negligible risk of per- or polyfluoroalkyl compounds in the formulation, which bioaccumulate and persist in the environment.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Skin sensitization and allergic contact dermatitis

Spray coatings can deposit chemicals on skin during application or handling. Without full ingredient transparency, potential allergens or sensitizers in the carrier solvent or resin cannot be ruled out. Users with reactive skin or chemical sensitivities face unknown risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Microplastic shedding from coating degradation

No public data exists on whether this product's coating sheds microplastics as it degrades during wear. If the waterproof layer is synthetic polymer-based, long-term weathering could release particles; durability and degradation pathways are undisclosed.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Spray treatment formulations sometimes include colorants or stabilizers that may contain trace metals. Gecko provides no analysis of lead, cadmium, or antimony content; this is a data gap rather than a confirmed hazard, but typical industry testing would rule this out.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Gecko does not appear to have published ingredient lists, safety data sheets, or third-party certifications (such as Bluesign, GOTS, or Oeko-Tex) for this product. The company maintains public silence on PFAS use despite growing industry discussion of fluorochemical avoidance. This lack of transparency is a material information gap in a product category where PFAS has historically been standard.

How it compares in its category

Shoe treatment sprays vary widely in waterproofing approach. Competitors like Nikwax use explicitly PFAS-free wax and hydrocarbon formulations, while established brands often use fluorochemical compounds without labeling. Gecko's refusal to disclose places it in an unverifiable middle ground that frustrates informed choice compared to brands with clear certifications or stated PFAS avoidance.

If you buy it

Apply only in well-ventilated outdoor spaces or with respiratory protection; do not use indoors or in enclosed areas. Allow footwear to dry fully (24 hours minimum) before wearing, as freshly coated shoes may off-gas solvents. Reapply only as water-beading diminishes, typically every 6-12 months with normal wear. Avoid skin and eye contact; wash hands thoroughly after use.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Ralyn has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Ralyn Aquatec Waterproof Shoe Protector?

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather

Nikwax

Waterproofing Wax for Leather

65GoodPFAS grade
  • wax-based waterproofing
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Respiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • mink oil paste, natural oil-based conditioner
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microbial growth (natural oil rancidity)

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Timberland Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

Timberland

Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Wax-based leather protector
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvents

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More fabric stain guard sprays grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.