PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall61/ 100Good
Head Shoulders Smooth Silky Dandruff Shampoo

Head & Shoulders · Shampoo

Head Shoulders Smooth Silky Dandruff Shampoo

Excellent

Lower concern. Liquid shampoo formulation lacks typical PFAS application pathways.

Verdict · BuyLiquid shampoo with lower PFAS concern and no established heavy hazards; standard personal care product.

Head & Shoulders Smooth Silky is a rinse-off aqueous shampoo with no disclosed water-repellency, nonstick, or stain-resistance features typical of PFAS use. No public lab testing or brand PFAS claims available. Lower concern profile for this product category.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo formulation, typical surfactants and conditioning agents

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Head Shoulders Smooth Dandruff Shampoo is made of, ingredients and materials

Head & Shoulders Smooth Silky is an aqueous shampoo formulation containing surfactants (likely sodium lauryl sulfate or similar), conditioning agents, and fragrance. The product is designed to dissolve completely in water and rinse away, which minimizes skin penetration and systemic exposure pathways. As a rinse-off personal care product, it is not ingested or absorbed in meaningful quantity, and its brief contact with skin limits concern compared to leave-on products.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏭

1,4-dioxane (manufacturing contaminant)

Conventional shampoos may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as an unintended byproduct of ethoxylated surfactants. No specific testing or recall exists for this product, but the hazard is common across the category and regulated at very low levels in finished products.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Head & Shoulders Smooth Silky contains fragrance, which can trigger contact dermatitis or allergic reactions in sensitive individuals. The specific fragrance components are not fully disclosed on the label; fragrance sensitivity is common in shampoos and is not unique to this brand.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., dmdm hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) are documented in this product's publicly available ingredient lists. Standard shampoo preservation typically uses paraben esters or phenoxyethanol, which do not release formaldehyde.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Liquid shampoos do not typically use mineral pigments or lead-containing additives. No recalls or contamination reports exist for this product. Concern is lower than for powders or leave-on cosmetics that may accumulate metals.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

This shampoo formulation does not include exfoliating beads or microplastic spheres. Liquid shampoos are not a known source of microplastic pollution in the way some scrubs or body washes are.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Procter & Gamble (Head & Shoulders parent) has not published formal ingredient disclosure or safety certifications specific to PFAS avoidance, though the liquid formulation reduces PFAS application risk inherently. The brand has faced no major recalls or established controversies tied to this shampoo's ingredient safety. P&G follows regulatory compliance in markets including the US and EU but does not highlight third-party safety certifications for this product line.

How it compares in its category

This shampoo sits in the mainstream mass-market segment; rinse-off shampoos generally carry lower hazard profiles than leave-on conditioners or styling products because ingredients are not retained on skin or hair. Versus premium or natural brands, Head & Shoulders offers no additional transparency, but also no known added risk. Formaldehyde or 1,4-dioxane as manufacturing contaminants are possible in any conventional shampoo but are not specifically documented for this product.

If you buy it

Use as directed, apply to wet hair, lather, rinse thoroughly with water. Do not ingest or allow prolonged contact with eyes. Store in a cool, dry place and replace when empty or if the bottle leaks. No special precautions are required beyond standard shampoo safety; discontinue use if scalp irritation develops, as this suggests a reaction to fragrance or surfactant rather than a contamination issue.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Head & Shoulders has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More shampoo grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.