PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall24/ 100Bad
Jason Markk Repel Bundle Stain & Water Repellent Spray + Refill

Jason Markk · Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

Jason Markk Repel Bundle Stain & Water Repellent Spray + Refill

Poor

Get brand to disclose PFAS status of repellent formula.

Verdict · SkipPFAS status undisclosed by brand; no other established hazards on record, but repellent formula opacity demands caution and verification before purchase.

Jason Markk's repellent spray uses undisclosed coating chemistry common in water-resistant treatments that often include PFAS. No third-party verification or PFAS transparency exists.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

proprietary water/stain repellent spray coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Jason Markk Repel Bundle Stain Refill is made of, ingredients and materials

Jason Markk Repel is a proprietary water and stain repellent spray applied topically to footwear and textiles. The exact chemical formulation is not publicly disclosed by the brand, which is the core safety concern, without ingredient transparency, it is impossible to rule out hazardous classes such as PFAS compounds (which have become standard in water repellents). The spray is designed to form a protective barrier on fabric surfaces without altering the material's breathability or appearance.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Vague safety claims only

Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

Brand has not disclosed whether the repellent formula contains per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances, which are standard in legacy water repellents and persist in the environment and body indefinitely.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
💨

Inhalation risk from spray application

Any aerosol spray carries risk of particulate or vapor inhalation if applied indoors without ventilation; proprietary formula opacity prevents assessment of respiratory irritant potential.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin or eye contact from overspray

No safety data sheet or ingredient list is publicly available to evaluate irritancy potential if spray contacts skin or eyes during application.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bioaccumulation via treated textiles

If the formula contains fluorinated compounds, residues may transfer to skin or wash water; the lack of transparency prevents risk quantification.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Allergic sensitization from undisclosed additives

No reported cases of contact dermatitis or sensitization linked to this product; however, without ingredient disclosure, individual sensitivity to fragrance agents or solvent carriers cannot be ruled out.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Jason Markk has not published a full ingredient list or PFAS content statement for this product as of public record. The brand maintains a general marketing position around performance and durability but has not responded to industry pressure for chemical transparency common among footwear and apparel care brands. No significant recalls or regulatory actions are on record for this specific product, but the silent stance on PFAS contrasts with competitors who have begun disclosing repellent chemistry or switching to PFAS-free alternatives.

How it compares in its category

Water repellent sprays for clothing and footwear are a mature category where PFAS legacy compounds (DPHF, Teflon-type coating-based formulas) have historically dominated. Some competitors, including Crep Protect and Nikwax, have either disclosed low-PFAS or PFAS-free formulations; Jason Markk's refusal to disclose puts it in the less transparent tier. The bundle format (spray plus refill) is standard and cost-effective for heavy users, but does not offset the chemical uncertainty.

If you buy it

Apply in a well-ventilated area or outdoors to minimize inhalation of spray particles; do not apply to wet or freshly cleaned textiles. Allow items to dry fully before wearing (typically 24 hours). Reapply every 6-12 months depending on wear and washing frequency, as water repellency degrades over time. Before purchasing, contact Jason Markk directly requesting full ingredient disclosure and PFAS status; if they do not respond, consider switching to a brand with transparent chemistry.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Jason Markk has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Jason Markk Repel Bundle Stain & Water Repellent Spray + Refill?

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather

Nikwax

Waterproofing Wax for Leather

65GoodPFAS grade
  • wax-based waterproofing
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Respiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • mink oil paste, natural oil-based conditioner
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microbial growth (natural oil rancidity)

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Timberland Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

Timberland

Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Wax-based leather protector
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvents

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More fabric stain guard sprays grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.