PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall14/ 100Bad
Jason Markk Repel Refill Shoe & Hat Protectant

Jason Markk · Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

Jason Markk Repel Refill Shoe & Hat Protectant

Poor

Get brand to disclose coating chemistry or provide independent tests.

Verdict · SkipReputable brand with established safety record, but undisclosed PFAS chemistry and lack of third-party testing warrant cautious use with proper ventilation.

Jason Markk's spray provides durable waterproofing through an undisclosed proprietary coating. No PFAS claims or third-party testing are available for this product.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Proprietary water-repellent spray coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and inhalation risk

Spray-applied protectants inherently release propellant and solvent vapors during application. Jason Markk does not disclose VOC content or air quality testing. Inhalation exposure during application is significant and controllable only through ventilation practices.

20/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Some water-repellent coatings use brominated or chlorinated compounds as co-stabilizers or durability enhancers. Jason Markk does not disclose ingredient chemistry, so the presence of halogenated additives cannot be confirmed or ruled out.

Source, EPA
70/ 100
🍳

Skin sensitization from residual coating or fragrance

Direct skin contact with wet spray or fully cured coating is unlikely during normal use, but fragrance is sometimes added to shoe care products. Jason Markk Repel has minimal perceptible odor, suggesting low fragrance content, but no allergen declaration is provided.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public records indicate formaldehyde resins in Jason Markk Repel. Fabric protectants typically do not use formaldehyde-based chemistry, but undisclosed proprietary formulas cannot be ruled out without testing.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes or toxic colorants in the product itself

The spray itself is clear or nearly colorless and contains no added dyes. No hazard reported or plausible in this product type.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Jason Markk Repel is a proprietary spray-applied water and stain repellent for textiles and footwear. The exact chemical composition is not publicly disclosed, which is standard practice for branded coating products but limits independent safety assessment. Spray application means inhalation exposure is the primary route of concern during use. The product is designed to bond to fabric fibers rather than remain on the surface, suggesting a coating chemistry that cross-links or polymerizes on the substrate.

The brand's record and disclosure

Jason Markk is a premium footwear care brand with no documented recalls or safety complaints in public records. The company does not publicly disclose whether its water-repellent formulation contains PFAS (per fluorinated compounds), does not claim PFOA or PFOS-free status, and provides no third-party testing certificates for VOC or hazardous chemical content. This silent stance on chemistry is a significant transparency gap, especially given industry-wide scrutiny of PFAS in water repellents. No certifications such as Bluesign, OEKO-TEX, or GOTS are advertised.

How it compares in its category

Most spray fabric protectants in the footwear market either use PFAS-based chemistries (cheaper, more durable) or newer paraffin/silicone/fluorocarbon alternatives marketed as PFAS-free. Jason Markk does not declare which approach it uses, placing it in a middle ground of uncertainty. Competitors such as Crep Protect and Sneaker Lab also do not disclose PFAS status, but some brands (e.g., those certified Bluesign) are more transparent. For users seeking proven PFAS-free options, this product does not provide the assurance needed.

If you buy it

Apply in a well-ventilated space or outdoors to minimize inhalation of spray mist and propellant vapors. Do not inhale fumes and allow sprayed items to dry fully (typically 24 hours) in open air before wearing or storing in enclosed spaces. Reapply every 6-12 months depending on wear and washing frequency; reapplication frequency is higher than solvent-based alternatives. Store the bottle in a cool, dry place away from heat and direct sunlight, and follow the label instructions for distance and number of coats to avoid over-saturation.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Jason Markk has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather

Nikwax

Waterproofing Wax for Leather

wax-based waterproofing

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade51Good
💨

Respiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application

Limited concern

70
♾️

PFAS

Moderate concern

45

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Timberland Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

Timberland

Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

Wax-based leather protector

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade39Poor
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvents

High concern

20
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Skin sensitization from undisclosed additives

Limited concern

70

Wax coating lower concern than synthetic waterproofing, but unconfirmed.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Angelus Mink Oil Paste Leather Waterproofer and Contitioner 3 oz

Angelus

Mink Oil Paste Leather Waterproofer and Contitioner 3 oz

mink oil paste, natural oil-based conditioner

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
⚠️

Microbial growth (natural oil rancidity)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin sensitization (mink oil allergenicity)

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; natural oil product unlikely to contain PFAS but unverified.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More fabric stain guard sprays grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.