PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall53/ 100Good
kin+Kind Flea & Tick Shampoo Lemongrass

Kin+Kind · Shampoo

kin+Kind Flea & Tick Shampoo Lemongrass

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern for liquid pet shampoo with no water-repellent or nonstick claims.

Verdict: BuyAqueous pet shampoo with botanical actives, no reported safety issues, lower PFAS profile, safe for intended use with standard precautions.

This flea and tick shampoo is a rinse-off liquid with no water-resistant, stain-resistant, or coating technologies that typically introduce PFAS. The brand makes no PFAS claims or offers verification.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo base with botanical actives (lemongrass)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Aqueous shampoo bases typically use preservative systems such as imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin, or methyl/propyl parabens to prevent microbial growth. While these are generally recognized as safe at regulated levels, formaldehyde-releaser preservatives can trigger contact dermatitis or sensitization in susceptible animals. No specific allergen labeling for this product's preservative system

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Essential oil and fragrance allergenicity

Lemongrass essential oil and lemongrass-derived fragrance compounds are common allergens in sensitive skin. Dogs and cats lack certain liver enzymes for efficient metabolism of some volatile plant constituents, potentially increasing irritation or sensitization risk. The product does not disclose whether the fragrance is pure essential oil, synthetic lemongrass isolates, or mixed; sensitivity vari

70/ 100
🐛

Pesticide residue

Lemongrass has documented repellent properties against certain flea and tick species, but efficacy is lower and shorter-duration than synthetic pesticides. Incomplete rinse or application on wet fur may leave residue; if ingested during grooming, botanical actives at high concentration pose low but non-zero risk of gastrointestinal irritation.

Source: EPA
45/ 100
⚠️

Ingestion toxicity if swallowed in quantity

Accidental ingestion of shampoo during application is a routine concern in pet care. Lemongrass shampoo is generally of low acute toxicity, but surfactants and essential oil at high dose can cause mild gastrointestinal upset, drooling, or vomiting. Kin+Kind does not prominently display toxicity guidance; contact poison control or a veterinarian if significant ingestion occurs.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Microbiological contamination if unmaintained

No recalls or contamination events on record for this product. Standard liquid shampoo hygiene (sealed cap, cool storage, prompt use after opening) prevents bacterial or mold growth. Risk is minimized by the preservative system and aqueous base, though opened bottles left in warm, humid bathrooms face generic contamination risk common to all liquid personal-care products.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Kin+Kind Flea & Tick Shampoo is a water-based formulation featuring lemongrass as the primary botanical active ingredient. The product contains surfactants (cleansing agents), preservatives, and fragrance compounds derived from or mimicking lemongrass essential oil. Unlike synthetic pesticide-based alternatives, botanical shampoos rely on plant-derived compounds for insect-repelling activity, which generally carry lower acute toxicity but require more frequent reapplication and may cause contact irritation in sensitive animals.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kin+Kind markets itself as a natural pet care brand but maintains silent positioning on PFAS use or avoidance. The brand does not prominently disclose third-party certifications (such as EPA Safer Choice, USDA Organic, or cruelty-free seals) on widely available product information. No major recalls or safety controversies for this specific product are on public record. Ingredient transparency is limited to standard product labeling without detailed breakdowns of preservative systems or fragrance constituents.

How it compares in its category

Pet flea shampoos range from synthetic pyrethroid-based formulations (higher efficacy, stricter EPA oversight) to plant-extract and essential-oil formulations (lower chemical load, variable efficacy). Kin+Kind sits in the botanical segment, competing with brands like Earthbath and Burt's Bees for Pets. Botanical options typically cost more, require more frequent use, and appeal to owners seeking gentler chemistry; they are less regulated than EPA-approved pesticide shampoos, which means fewer safety guarantees but also lower systemic toxin exposure.

If you buy it

Apply only as directed on the label, typically 1-2 times weekly for flea prevention or management. Avoid contact with the animal's eyes and ears; rinse thoroughly after the recommended contact time. Monitor your pet for signs of skin irritation, excessive scratching, or allergic reaction, particularly if the animal has sensitive skin or known sensitivities to plant oils. Store in a cool, dark place and replace if the product separates significantly, develops an off odor, or exceeds its shelf life, typically 12-24 months for liquid formulations.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Kin+Kind has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.