PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall49/ 100Poor
kin+kind Itchy Dog Shampoo

Kin+Kind · Shampoo

kin+kind Itchy Dog Shampoo

Excellent

Lower concern for a shampoo without PFAS requirement, though transparency is absent.

Verdict: Buy with careAqueous shampoo with no major established hazards; PFAS transparency gap is minor for rinse-off product category.

This liquid surfactant-based cosmetic requires no waterproofing, nonstick, or water-repellent coating that would necessitate PFAS. Kin+Kind does not disclose PFAS policy or testing, and no public lab verification exists.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo base (surfactants, water, plant extracts)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and essential oils in botanical blends

Plant-extract shampoos can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive dogs. Kin+Kind does not itemize specific essential oils or fragrance compounds on available product labels, making individual allergen assessment difficult.

70/ 100
⚠️

Microbial contamination or bacterial growth during storage

Aqueous shampoos rely on preservatives to prevent mold and bacteria. If Kin+Kind uses minimal preservatives to maintain a 'natural' claim, microbial risk rises if the bottle is left open or stored in warm, humid bathrooms; typical for this category.

70/ 100
⚠️

Surfactant irritation to eyes or skin if not rinsed thoroughly

Any shampoo poses irritation risk if trapped in a dog's eyes or left on skin. Kin+Kind is marketed as mild but contains surfactants; thorough rinsing is essential, especially for dogs with existing skin inflammation.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No credible evidence that Kin+Kind uses DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, or other formaldehyde-releasing preservatives; aqueous rinse-off products typically use gentler systems (sorbates, benzoates), but full preservative identity is not disclosed.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or testing results report heavy metals in Kin+Kind shampoos. Plant-based colorants used in pet shampoos are generally low-risk, though mineral clays (if present) are not confirmed on the label.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Kin+Kind Itchy Dog Shampoo is a surfactant-based aqueous formulation designed for sensitive canine skin. The product relies on plant extracts (oatmeal, aloe, other botanicals) and mild surfactants to clean without heavy detergency. Since shampoos are rinse-off products that do not stay on skin or in the body, residual chemical burden is lower than leave-on personal care items.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kin+Kind markets itself as a natural and pet-safe brand but does not publicly disclose full ingredient sourcing or third-party certifications (e.g., Natural, Leaping Bunny). The brand has not made public commitments to PFAS avoidance or transparency, a gap shared by most pet shampoo manufacturers. No recalls or safety controversies are on record for this specific product line.

How it compares in its category

Pet shampoos typically avoid harsh sulfates and parabens more consistently than human shampoos because pet owners scrutinize formulations. Kin+Kind positions itself in the premium natural segment, similar to Earthbath and similar brands. It lacks independent certifications (USDA Organic, EWG Verified) that some competitors carry, making ingredient verification harder.

If you buy it

Use as directed on damp coat and rinse thoroughly; no special precautions needed beyond standard shampoo safety (keep out of eyes). Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to maintain ingredient stability. Discontinue if your dog shows new skin irritation and patch-test on a small area first if the animal has severe sensitivities.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Kin+Kind has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.