PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
kin+Kind Itchy Pet Shampoo

Kin+Kind · Shampoo

kin+Kind Itchy Pet Shampoo

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern; rinse-off pet shampoo unlikely to contain intentional fluorochemicals.

Verdict · BuyAqueous pet shampoo with no hazard of this kind on record; lower PFAS concern typical for rinse-off formulas; lower concern for routine use.

This plant-derived pet shampoo has no water-resistant or stain-resistant treatments that typically contain PFAS. As a rinse-off liquid, it carries lower PFAS risk than durable textiles or nonstick cookware.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo base (surfactants, water, glycerin)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What kin+Kind Itchy Pet Shampoo is made of, ingredients and materials

Kin+Kind Itchy Pet Shampoo is a water-based formulation containing surfactants (cleansing agents), glycerin (humectant), and botanical extracts marketed for sensitive or itchy skin. The product is designed to be diluted and rinsed thoroughly, which sharply limits skin contact time and absorption risk compared to leave-on products. As a rinse-off formula, residual chemicals are substantially removed during bathing, reducing systemic exposure.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and botanical extracts

Shampoos marketed with botanical ingredients (oat extract, aloe, etc.) can contain natural allergens and irritants. Individual pet sensitivity varies; some animals react to plant-derived compounds even in hypoallergenic formulas.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation from pH imbalance or surfactant harshness

All shampoos carry inherent irritation risk if pH is mismatched to pet skin (dogs typically 6.5-7.5) or surfactants are too stripping. Kin+Kind's gentle positioning suggests attention to this, but no published pH or surfactant strength data is available for verification.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

1,4-dioxane (surfactant contaminant)

No testing or contamination reports are on record for Kin+Kind products. However, 1,4-dioxane can occur as a manufacturing byproduct in some surfactants; the company does not publicly disclose supplier vetting for this contaminant.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No reported use of DMDM hydantoin or other formaldehyde-releasing agents in this product. Kin+Kind's natural positioning suggests avoidance of this class, but ingredient transparency is limited.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No testing or recalls indicate heavy metal contamination in Kin+Kind formulations. Risk is generally low in aqueous shampoos, but botanical extracts sourcing is not publicly disclosed.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Kin+Kind positions itself as a natural pet care brand with claims around hypoallergenic and gentle formulations, though the company provides limited transparency on full ingredient sourcing or third-party safety certifications. No major recalls or safety controversies are on record for this product line. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS testing results, which is typical for smaller natural brands but represents a gap in proactive safety communication.

How it compares in its category

Pet shampoos span a wide range of formulation philosophies, from heavily fragranced conventional products to minimalist botanical blends. Kin+Kind positions toward the natural/botanical end, which generally correlates with lower synthetic chemical burden, though botanical ingredients carry their own allergen and irritant variability. Most pet shampoos in this category carry similar low PFAS risk due to rinse-off use patterns; Kin+Kind does not stand out as higher or lower risk than comparable natural brands.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve botanical stability. Always dilute according to label directions; concentrated formulas are more likely to cause skin irritation if applied undiluted. If your pet develops redness, excessive itching, or other skin reactions after use, discontinue and consult a veterinarian. For pets with diagnosed allergies or sensitivities, patch-test on a small area first, as botanical extracts can trigger reactions in some animals even when labeled hypoallergenic.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Kin+Kind has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More shampoo grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.