PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Kristin Ess Hair Strengthening Shampoo

Kristin Ess · Shampoo

Kristin Ess Hair Strengthening Shampoo

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern for typical shampoo; no water-resistant coating triggers, but brand offers no transparency.

Verdict · BuyStandard aqueous shampoo with no established contamination issues; lower PFAS risk profile; brand transparency limited but product category poses minimal inherent hazard.

This rinse-off liquid has no waterproofing, stain resistance, or nonstick functions typical of PFAS use. The brand provides no PFAS statement or testing, and third-party lab data is unavailable.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo base, surfactants, conditioning agents

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Kristin Ess Hair Strengthening Shampoo is made of, ingredients and materials

Kristin Ess Hair Strengthening Shampoo is a water-based formulation containing surfactants (cleansing agents), conditioning polymers, and likely silicones or protein derivatives marketed as strengthening actives. The aqueous base and typical shampoo surfactant chemistry present no known acute toxicity risks at intended use (diluted, rinsed from hair). Unlike leave-on products, rinse-off shampoos have minimal skin absorption and systemic exposure risk.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitization

Kristin Ess does not publicly disclose fragrance components (likely proprietary blend). Synthetic fragrances in shampoos can trigger contact dermatitis or scalp sensitivity in susceptible individuals; no brand-specific allergy reports on record.

70/ 100
⚠️

Preservative-related irritation

Standard shampoos use preservatives (e.g., parabens, methylisothiazolinone) to prevent microbial growth. Kristin Ess does not declare preservative type publicly. Preservatives are present at dilutions that typically do not cause concern in rinse-off products but may irritate sensitive scalps in rare cases.

70/ 100
⚠️

Scalp irritation from conditioning agents or silicones

Silicones and heavy conditioning polymers in strengthening shampoos may accumulate on the scalp or cause irritation if rinsing is incomplete. Risk is individual and not brand-specific; typical for this product category.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct contamination)

Some surfactants in shampoos can be contaminated with 1,4-dioxane during manufacture. No testing or reports of contamination specific to Kristin Ess products have been published; standard industry practice does not trigger known risk for this brand.

95/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Kristin Ess Hair Strengthening Shampoo is not marketed as an exfoliating or scrub product and contains no known intentional microbeads. Standard conditioning polymers are soluble and do not persist as microplastics.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Kristin Ess (owned by Unilever) has not published detailed ingredient safety or sourcing transparency reports specific to this line. The brand does not independently certify formulations (e.g., no EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny, or similar badges on record). No recalls or established safety controversies have been publicly reported for this product. Brand transparency on PFAS, preservatives, or fragrance allergen disclosure remains limited.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the mainstream commercial shampoo tier. It lacks third-party safety certifications that distinguish premium or clean beauty alternatives (e.g., EWG Verified, Whole Foods Quality Standards). Compared to sulfate-free or preservative-disclosed brands, Kristin Ess offers standard formulation without public safety differentiation. For a mass-market shampoo, ingredient risk profile is typical, not elevated.

If you buy it

Use as directed, wet hair, lather, rinse thoroughly with water. Avoid contact with eyes; rinse immediately if contact occurs. Store in a cool, dry place to minimize preservative degradation. No special handling required. Discontinue if scalp irritation or allergic reaction develops. Standard shampoo shelf life is 2-3 years; replace if consistency, odor, or color change noticeably.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Kristin Ess has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More shampoo grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.