PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall59/ 100Good
Kristin Ess+ Peptide Boost Volumizing Shampoo

Kristin Ess · Shampoo

Kristin Ess+ Peptide Boost Volumizing Shampoo

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern than treated textiles or coatings, but brand offers no transparency.

Verdict: BuyAqueous shampoo with no established hazards; PFAS level modest for category; brand transparency gap acceptable for rinse-off product.

This rinse-off liquid shampoo contains no Teflon-family coating, water-repellent coatings, or non-stick surfaces. The brand doesn't publicly disclose PFAS practices or verify testing; rinse-off products pose lower exposure risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo base with peptides and surfactants

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (synthetic byproduct)

Surfactant manufacturing can introduce trace 1,4-dioxane in rinse-off products; no specific testing data publicly available for this formulation. The risk is mitigated by thorough rinsing and dilution, but brand does not disclose whether purification steps are taken.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Many shampoos use preservatives such as DMDM hydantoin or imidazolidinyl urea that release low levels of formaldehyde to prevent microbial growth. Kristin Ess does not list these ingredients on public product labels reviewed; specific preservative system is unclear.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed ingredients)

Product lists 'fragrance' as a catchall term without naming individual allergens such as limonene, linalool, or eugenol. Individuals with sensitive scalps or fragrance sensitivities may experience irritation; patch testing is advisable for those with known fragrance allergies.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial or mold contamination (post-purchase)

Aqueous shampoo formulations can support microbial growth if lid is left open or product is stored in warm, humid environments (e.g., bathroom). This is a user-handling risk rather than a manufacturing defect; proper storage minimizes likelihood.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or test data on record for heavy metals in this product line. Shampoos are lower risk than pigmented cosmetics, but brand provides no third-party testing transparency to confirm absence.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Kristin Ess+ Peptide Boost is a water-based shampoo formulation containing amino acid peptides as conditioning agents and surfactants (likely sodium lauryl sulfate or sulfate-free alternatives) for cleansing. Peptides are proteins that are too large to penetrate skin or scalp and wash away completely with rinsing, making them inherently low-risk. The aqueous base means no volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or formaldehyde off-gassing typical of some other personal care categories.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kristin Ess (owned by Unilever) does not publicly disclose full ingredient sourcing, PFAS content testing, or third-party certifications like EWG Verified or Leaping Bunny. No product-specific safety recalls or controversies are on record for this line. The brand's silent stance on PFAS contrasts with some competitors who have committed to PFAS reduction, but for a rinse-off shampoo, the reputational risk is lower than for leave-on products.

How it compares in its category

Most mass-market volumizing shampoos use surfactant blends and conditioning polymers similar to this formulation. Kristin Ess+ sits in the mid-tier for ingredient transparency; it is less transparent than indie brands with certified ingredient lists but not outlier in the drugstore category. Peptide-based conditioners are a common marketing differentiator and carry no additional safety burden versus traditional silicone or polymer alternatives.

If you buy it

Use as directed on damp hair, rinse thoroughly with water, and store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve formulation stability. No special precautions needed beyond standard shampoo handling (avoid eyes, keep lid sealed to prevent bacterial growth in the bottle). Replace if the product separates, changes color, or develops an off odor, typically within 12 to 24 months of opening.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Kristin Ess has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.