PFAS80/ 100Excellent
Overall72/ 100Good
LocknLock Stainless Steel Food Storage Containers with Lids, Metal Lunch Boxes, Leak-Proof, Microwave, Freezer and Dishw

Lock & Lock · Lunch Boxes

LocknLock Stainless Steel Food Storage Containers with Lids, Metal Lunch Boxes, Leak-Proof, Microwave, Freezer and Dishw

Excellent

Lower concern. Bare stainless steel and metal containers carry minimal PFAS risk.

Verdict · BuyStainless steel construction eliminates most food-contact hazards; no major brand safety incidents on record; PFAS risk minimal.

Lock & Lock stainless steel containers are bare metal without non-stick or water-resistant coatings, presenting lower PFAS concern. No PFAS-related claims or third-party verification available.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Stainless steel and metal

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What LocknLock Stainless Steel Food Storage is made of, ingredients and materials

Lock & Lock's stainless steel containers use food-grade 18/8 or 18/10 stainless steel (chromium-nickel alloy) for the body, which is chemically inert and does not leach metals under normal use. The lids typically combine stainless steel with silicone or plastic gaskets for the seal. Stainless steel is non-porous and does not absorb odors or flavors, making it more durable than ceramic or plastic alternatives. Unlike coated cookware, there is no Teflon-type coating layer or ceramic glaze to degrade or release particles.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⏳

Silicone gasket degradation

The rubber or silicone seals in the lids can crack, harden, or develop mold if stored in humid conditions or not dried thoroughly after washing. Compromised gaskets reduce leak-proof performance and may harbor bacterial growth; replace gaskets annually or when visible damage appears.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial colonization in seal crevices

Tight-fitting gasket seams can trap moisture and food residue if not thoroughly cleaned and dried, potentially allowing mold or bacterial biofilm to develop. This is a maintenance issue rather than a material defect; proper hand washing and air drying between uses mitigates risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Bare uncoated material

Recorded as a bare, uncoated material with no surface coating or treatment.

100/ 100
✅

Nickel leaching (contact dermatitis risk for handlers, not food)

Food-grade 18/8 stainless steel contains controlled nickel levels approved for food contact in most jurisdictions. Leaching into food is negligible under normal storage conditions; risk to end users is not documented. Persons with severe nickel allergies may experience skin reaction from handling the container itself, not from stored food.

95/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

No public recalls or disclosed contamination of Lock & Lock stainless lid plastics with BPA or phthalates have been reported. However, the brand does not explicitly certify BPA-free status on most product listings; if this is a concern, contact the manufacturer or choose products labeled BPA-free.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Lock & Lock has no known major safety recalls or disclosed hazard controversies in public databases or consumer safety agencies for their stainless steel food containers. The brand does not publish detailed material certifications or PFAS/BPA avoidance statements on most product pages, but absence of disclosure does not indicate presence of hazard given the inherent inertness of bare stainless steel. The company operates in South Korea and has been selling plastic and stainless versions globally for over 20 years without widespread safety complaints documented in mainstream recalls.

How it compares in its category

Stainless steel containers are not materials linked to PFAS for food storage, ranking alongside glass. They outperform plastic containers (which may contain BPA, BPS, or phthalates if not explicitly BPA-free) and ceramic (which can harbor lead in older glazes). Lock & Lock's stainless option is comparable to competitor brands like Tupperware's stainless line or Rubbermaid Brilliance stainless, with similar durability and seal reliability. The primary trade-off is weight and cost versus plastic alternatives.

If you buy it

Stainless steel containers show lower concern for microwave and dishwasher use as stated, though the silicone gasket seals should be inspected periodically for cracks or mold growth and replaced if compromised. Do not use abrasive scrubbers that may scratch the interior, as this can create rough spots that harbor bacteria over time. Stainless steel is not harmed by acidic foods (unlike some coatings), so no restrictions on tomato sauce or citrus storage. Hand wash or use the gasket separately if your dishwasher runs very hot, as repeated extreme temperatures may degrade silicone faster than occasional use.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 82% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Lock & Lock has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Lunch Boxes

Klean Kanteen Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

Klean Kanteen

Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel body, silicone gasket lid seal
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Silicone gasket degradation

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More lunch boxes grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.