PFAS80/ 100Excellent
Overall72/ 100Good
Essaware - Lunch Mate - Stainless Steel - Reusable Sandwich Container - Homeplace Market

Essaware · Lunch Boxes

Essaware - Lunch Mate - Stainless Steel - Reusable Sandwich Container - Homeplace Market

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern. Bare stainless steel container, no coatings detected.

Verdict · BuyBare stainless steel food container with minimal leaching risk, no coating degradation concerns, and excellent PFAS profile.

Stainless steel lunch container with no reported nonstick or water-resistant coatings. Standard food-contact stainless steel carries lower PFAS risk than coated alternatives.

Find it on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Stainless steel, bare uncoated

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Essaware - Lunch Mate Homeplace Market is made of, ingredients and materials

This Essaware container is constructed from bare stainless steel with no polymer coatings, enamel, or ceramic liners. Stainless steel is a food-safe alloy (typically 18/8 or 18/10 chromium-nickel composition) that does not leach BPA, phthalates, or other endocrine disruptors into food. The uncoated design eliminates risks from coating breakdown, peeling, or abrasion that plague coated cookware and storage vessels over time.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⛏️

Nickel leaching

Stainless steel always contains nickel. Leaching into food is minimal under normal use but can increase with prolonged storage of acidic foods. People with nickel sensitivity should exercise caution.

70/ 100
⛏️

Chromium leaching

Chromium is also a steel component. Migration is typically negligible in bare steel under normal conditions, but acidic or salty foods stored long-term may increase release rates slightly.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Bare uncoated material

Recorded as a bare, uncoated material with no surface coating or treatment.

100/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

No information available on gasket or seal composition for this specific model. If seals are present, verify they are listed as rubber, silicone, or polypropylene rather than contaminated PVC or polycarbonate.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Microplastic generation

Bare stainless steel does not fragment or shed microplastics. This hazard is not applicable to metal containers.

95/ 100
✅

Coating degradation and flaking

Uncoated stainless steel eliminates the risk of enamel, ceramic, or polymer coatings peeling into food over the product lifetime.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Emsa is a German housewares manufacturer with no public record of food-contact recalls or material safety violations. The company does not prominently disclose third-party certifications (such as FDA, BPA-free labeling, or migration testing results) on typical product packaging. No established controversies regarding material safety or manufacturing practices have surfaced in public databases.

How it compares in its category

Bare stainless steel containers rank among options with lower concern for reusable food storage, alongside glass. They outperform plastic containers (which carry BPA/BPS and phthalate risks) and coated ceramic or enamel containers (which risk lead or cadmium in glazes). Stainless steel offers durability and no degradation pathway that typical polymer-lined alternatives face.

If you buy it

Hand wash rather than dishwasher to avoid potential salt-etching over decades of use; stainless steel is highly resistant but not immune to corrosion in extreme alkaline detergent environments. Avoid prolonged storage of acidic foods (vinegar, citrus, tomato) in contact with bare steel, as prolonged acid exposure can microscopically leach nickel. Inspect seals or hinges periodically for wear. This container is suitable for cold or room-temperature foods; verify manufacturer guidance for hot food contact.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 82% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Essaware has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Essaware - Lunch Mate - Stainless Steel - Reusable Sandwich Container - Homeplace Market?

  • Stainless steel body, silicone gasket lid seal
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Silicone gasket degradation

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More lunch boxes grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.