PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall13/ 100Bad

Love Luna · Period Underwear

Period Midi Brief

Poor

Skip until brand discloses coating chemistry or certifies PFAS-free.

Verdict · SkipUnspecified waterproof coating chemistry combined with poor PFAS grade and brand silence on material safety makes informed assessment impossible.

Love Luna does not disclose what waterproofing or absorbent coatings are used on this period brief. Common period-care textiles often use PFAS-based treatments for fluid management, but no public data confirms or rules this out for this product.

The better-graded swap

Organic Cotton Period Underwear

Lola

Organic Cotton Period Underwear

95/100 safety

95Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Cotton with unspecified waterproof/absorbent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Period Midi Brief is made of, ingredients and materials

Love Luna's Period Midi Brief uses cotton as the base fiber paired with an unspecified waterproof or absorbent coating. The coating formulation is not disclosed by the brand, meaning its chemical composition, durability, and leaching potential cannot be evaluated. Cotton itself is low-risk, but the coating applied to achieve waterproofing or moisture management is the unknown variable that determines whether this product poses skin contact hazards during extended wear in a sensitive area.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🍳

Unspecified coating leachates and skin irritants

The waterproof or absorbent coating formulation is proprietary and undisclosed. During wear in a warm, humid, acidic environment (menstrual fluid), polymers or plasticizers in the coating may migrate onto mucous membranes or skin; without knowing the coating chemistry, the identity and concentration of potential leachates cannot be assessed.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microplastic shedding

If the waterproof coating is a polymer, wear and laundering will cause degradation over time. The product does not specify durability limits or how many wash cycles the coating can withstand before shedding particles into wastewater or onto skin.

70/ 100
🧴

Phthalates

Waterproof textiles sometimes use plasticized polymers (PVC or polyurethane with phthalates) to achieve flexibility. Love Luna has not ruled this out. Phthalate exposure from prolonged skin contact is a known concern in menstrual product safety literature, particularly for products worn for 4-8 hours at a time.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public evidence indicates Love Luna uses formaldehyde-releasing resins in this product. However, the brand has not confirmed the absence of formaldehyde or durable-press finishes on the cotton base, and this is standard to verify for intimatewear given skin sensitivity.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Azo dyes or synthetic colorants

No specific information on dye chemistry for this product is available. Period briefs are typically dyed dark colors to conceal staining; if synthetic azo dyes are used without restriction, potential skin sensitization or allergic contact dermatitis is theoretically possible, though not reported for this brand.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Love Luna has not publicly disclosed the chemistry of the waterproof coating or provided third-party certifications (such as OEKO-TEX, GOTS, or PFAS-free statements) for this product. The brand's silence on PFAS and coating ingredients is notable given that many period-care brands marketing to health-conscious consumers now provide this transparency. No recalls or established safety controversies for this specific product are on record, but absence of disclosure is not absence of risk.

How it compares in its category

Period briefs in this category typically use polyurethane, silicone, or proprietary polymer coatings to achieve waterproofing. Competitors increasingly disclose whether coatings are PFAS-free or provide third-party certifications. Love Luna's refusal to specify its coating technology places this product in a lower transparency tier than leading alternatives that openly state 'PFAS-free' or 'fluorine-free.' For a product worn close to skin for extended periods, this lack of transparency is a meaningful competitive disadvantage.

If you buy it

Wash before first use and inspect the coating for cracks, peeling, or degradation before each wear. Machine wash in cold water; avoid bleach and fabric softeners, which can degrade waterproof coatings. Air dry to prevent heat damage to the coating. Replace if the waterproof layer shows visible wear, as coating breakdown could expose unfinished cotton and compromise absorbency or durability. Monitor for skin irritation and discontinue use if rashes, itching, or allergic reactions develop.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Love Luna has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Period Midi Brief?

Rubylove First Period Kit +teen Period Underwear

Ruby Love

Rubylove First Period Kit +teen Period Underwear

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE
  • organic cotton, waterproof backing layer
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

3-Pack BOOST Brief

Lunapads

3-Pack BOOST Brief

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • organic cotton blend, water-resistant gusset
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Microplastic shedding from water-resistant barrier
Super Hipster

Aisle

Super Hipster

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Organic cotton, wood pulp fiber
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Azo dyes and synthetic dyes

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More period underwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.