PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Thinx Intimates & Sleepwear Thinx for All Women's Period Underwear

Thinx · Period Underwear

Thinx Intimates & Sleepwear Thinx for All Women's Period Underwear

Poor

Skip until Thinx reveals waterproof coating chemistry and testing.

Verdict: SkipEstablished brand with functional design, but PFAS waterproofing opacity and limited third-party testing warrant cautious use with regular replacement.

Waterproof barriers in period underwear commonly use PFAS-based water-repellent coating coatings. Thinx doesn't disclose its coating materials or test results.

The safe swap

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

Lola

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon, spandex, cotton blend with waterproof barrier layer

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Thinx's 2021 lawsuit settlement involved PFAS contamination; the company has not disclosed current waterproofing formulation or testing, making ongoing PFAS presence a reasonable assumption without proof of reformulation.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in synthetic fibers

Nylon and spandex blends may be dyed with azo compounds, which can produce allergenic aromatic amines under wear and laundering stress. No third-party certifications (OEKO-TEX) limit this risk.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Nylon and spandex are microplastic sources when mechanically stressed (washing, wear). Extended skin contact and laundering cycles mean this product is a direct exposure pathway, especially if the waterproof barrier degrades.

Source: EPA
70/ 100
🍂

Coating adhesion and leaching as barrier degrades

No manufacturer data on barrier lifespan; typical waterproof fabric coatings begin to flake or lose adhesion after 50-100 washes. Flaked coating particles contacting skin or entering washwater pose unknown exposure.

45/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Cotton-spandex blends sometimes use formaldehyde-containing resins for shape-hold and wrinkle resistance. Thinx does not disclose use of such finishes; cold-water washing may mitigate but not eliminate residual exposure.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Thinx period underwear uses a nylon-spandex-cotton blend with an undisclosed waterproof barrier layer that almost certainly relies on PFAS (per-fluorinated compounds) or similar hydrophobic coatings to repel menstrual fluid. The absorbent layer sits against skin for extended periods, creating potential for leachable chemicals to migrate during wear and washing. Cotton content provides some breathability, but the waterproof barrier is the functional, and chemically opaque, core of the product.

The brand's record and disclosure

Thinx has faced lawsuits (settled in 2021) over undisclosed PFAS in their product, yet the company has not published waterproof coating chemistry, PFAS testing results, or commitment to PFAS-free alternatives. The brand markets sustainability and body safety but does not provide third-party certifications (OEKO-TEX, GOTS, or similar) that would independently verify chemical safety. This silence on a known issue is a transparency red flag in a category where competitors increasingly disclose their approaches.

How it compares in its category

Period underwear competitors vary widely: some brands (Knixwear, Dear Kate) have begun disclosing PFAS-free or reduced-PFAS waterproofing; others remain opaque. Thinx's market leadership makes its non-disclosure more concerning, as it signals that market dominance does not require chemical accountability. Traditional menstrual products (tampons, pads) avoid prolonged skin contact with waterproofing layers, making period underwear a higher-exposure category overall.

If you buy it

Wash new underwear before first use to reduce potential surface residue. Wash in cold water with mild detergent and air-dry; heat (dryer, hot water) may degrade the waterproof barrier and risk coating flake-off. Replace every 6-12 months depending on frequency of use and visible wear; degraded barriers may lose water resistance and expose the nylon-spandex blend. Monitor for any skin irritation and consider rotating with traditional products to reduce cumulative exposure time.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 55% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Thinx has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Period Underwear

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

Modibodi

Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

organic cotton blend with water-resistant coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent

Water-resistant coating degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth and odor with improper care

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. MADE SAFE certified, PFAS-free claimed and tested.

MADE SAFE

Lab test found no PFAS

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

Lola

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

organic cotton with water-resistant treatment

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
🫧

Water-resistant coating degradation and microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Allergen sensitivity to cotton or treatment additives

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; PFAS-free certified, organic cotton base.

MADE SAFE CertifiedOEKO-TEX Standard 100

Lab test found no PFAS

Organic Cotton Period Underwear

Lola

Organic Cotton Period Underwear

organic cotton with gusseted absorbent layer

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade58Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes and color fastness

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Organic cotton core, no water-resistant treatment disclosed.

Risky category by default

More period underwear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.