PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall57/ 100Good
MAC Studio Radiance Serum-Powered Foundation

MAC · Cosmetics

MAC Studio Radiance Serum-Powered Foundation

Good

Insufficient data. No PFAS claims or public lab testing available.

Verdict · SkipLiquid foundation with no established hazards on record; silicone and emollient base poses lower concern than powder or talc alternatives.

MAC has not disclosed PFAS ingredients or testing for this serum foundation. Typical liquid cosmetics carry low-to-moderate PFAS concern, but brand transparency is absent.

The better-graded swap

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup

Bare Minerals

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

liquid foundation with emollients and silicones

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What MAC Studio Radiance Foundation is made of, ingredients and materials

MAC Studio Radiance Serum-Powered Foundation is a liquid emulsion combining water, silicones (cyclomethicone or similar volatile silicones), and emollients with pigments and binders. The 'serum-powered' descriptor indicates humectant or conditioning agents mixed into a silicone-heavy fluid rather than an oil-in-water or water-in-oil cream. Liquid formulations avoid talc and pressed-powder manufacturing, eliminating those specific dust inhalation and contamination pathways. The silicone carrier itself is inert once applied and does not leach into skin in quantities of toxicological concern.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergen (undisclosed components)

MAC lists 'fragrance' as a single ingredient without component breakdown. Individual sensitivity to fragrance compounds (limonene, linalool, eugenol, etc.) cannot be screened without full disclosure. Prestige brands typically do not itemize fragrance fragmentation on packaging.

70/ 100
⚠️

Mica dust and respiratory exposure during application

Liquid foundations generally contain mica as a suspension aid or shimmer agent but do not generate airborne dust during application as powders do. Inhalation risk is substantially lower than from loose or pressed powder products. This product poses minimal acute respiratory concern from mica.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or regulatory warnings for MAC Studio Radiance specific to lead, cadmium, or arsenic in colorants. FDA regulates colorant certification; approved CI pigments (e.g., CI 77891 titanium dioxide, iron oxides) are monitored for heavy metal content. No evidence this product deviates from approved limits, but independent third-party testing is not public.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Liquid formulations typically use free-form preservatives (phenoxyethanol, parabens, methylisothiazolinone) or chelation systems rather than formaldehyde releasers. MAC does not claim formaldehyde-free status, suggesting standard preservative use, which is compliant with regulation. No formaldehyde-specific warnings are on record for this product.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Talc or asbestos contamination

Liquid foundation formulations do not use talc as a carrier. No talc-related hazard applies to this product category.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

MAC (Estée Lauder-owned) does not publish ingredient-by-ingredient safety certifications or independent lab audits for heavy metals, formaldehyde releasers, or fragrance allergen disclosure on product pages. The brand has not faced major recalls or regulatory actions specific to this product line as of public record. No third-party certifications (e.g., EWG, clean beauty standards, or heavy metal limits) are claimed. Ingredient lists are available on MAC's website and conform to regulatory labeling but lack proactive transparency beyond legal requirement.

How it compares in its category

Liquid foundations are the category norm and typically carry lower concern than powder, cream, or stick formats because they avoid talc, reduce airborne pigment exposure, and dilute colorants in a larger vehicle. MAC's silicone-forward formula is standard for prestige brands and does not differ materially from competitors (Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r, Bobbi Brown Skin Foundation, Urban Decay All Nighter). Pigment loading and fragrance allergen prevalence are not substantially higher or lower than peer products in the prestige price segment; all require ingredient review for individual sensitivities.

If you buy it

Store at room temperature away from direct heat or sunlight; silicone foundations are stable but fragrance components may degrade or separate if overheated. Shake before use to ensure pigment suspension. Patch-test on inner arm or behind ear first if you have known sensitivities to fragrance or mica-based pigments. Discard if product separates irreversibly, shows mold, or develops odor. Check the full ingredient list (available on MAC website) against known allergens; common sensitizers include fragrance, CI pigments, and preservatives, not the silicone base itself.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
MAC has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to MAC Studio Radiance Serum-Powered Foundation?

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup

Bare Minerals

bareMinerals Mineral Makeup

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Lead

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Ilia Beauty Clean Makeup

Ilia Beauty

Clean Makeup

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

RMS Beauty Organic Makeup

RMS Beauty

Organic Makeup

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Fragrance allergens and essential oils

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More cosmetics grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.