PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Mammut Eiger Free Pro HS Hooded Jacket Men

Mammut · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Mammut Eiger Free Pro HS Hooded Jacket Men

Bad

Higher PFAS risk due to waterproof coating. Mammut does not disclose.

Verdict · SkipPolyester ripstop with undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry poses moderate PFAS risk; no other established hazards identified, but purchase requires informed PFAS acceptance.

Eiger Free Pro uses polyester ripstop with waterproof water-repellent coating. Mammut provides no disclosure of which water-repellent coating chemistry is used on this model.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester ripstop outer with waterproof water-repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Mammut Eiger Free Pro HS Hooded Jacket Men is made of, ingredients and materials

The Eiger Free Pro uses a polyester ripstop outer layer bonded to a waterproof membrane with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. The ripstop construction itself (polyester nylon weave) poses no inherent chemical hazard. The water-repellent coating is the concern, Mammut does not publicly specify whether they use PFAS-based or PFAS-free water repellency, which is standard practice for performance outerwear brands at this price point. Polyester fibers themselves do not shed microplastics under normal wear, and the jacket is not designed for heating that would trigger polymer degradation.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Undisclosed waterproof finish on polyester ripstop almost certainly contains PFAS or related compounds; manufacturer silence suggests legacy chemistry without transition to alternatives.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
⏳

water-repellent coating degradation and re-exposure

As water-repellent coating wears, microfibrils of the underlying polyester may become exposed if the coating fragments; this poses no acute hazard but may accelerate water absorption and reduce jacket lifespan.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No evidence that Mammut uses formaldehyde-releasing resins in ripstop or seam taping. Standard polyester fabric does not require formaldehyde for water resistance.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Azo dyes in color fastness

Polyester ripstop typically uses reactive or disperse dyes; no public evidence of restricted azo dye use in Mammut products. Color migration to skin is minimal for outerwear.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Polyester production does not inherently require antimony catalysts in finished fabric; no recalls or testing evidence for this jacket.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Mammut is a well-established Swiss outerwear manufacturer owned by Dalian Highsee Group, but does not publish a public chemical disclosure policy or restricted substance list comparable to brands like Arc'teryx or The North Face. The company has not issued statements on PFAS phase-out timelines or alternative water-repellent coating options. This silence is notable in a category where competitors increasingly market PFAS-free certifications. No recalls or chemical controversies specific to Mammut jackets have been documented in public record.

How it compares in its category

Most ski jackets in this performance tier (Salomon, Helly Hansen, Patagonia, Arc'teryx) either disclose PFAS-free water-repellent coating or commit to phase-out dates. Mammut's lack of transparency places it in a middling position, better than budget brands that actively use PFAS, but behind market leaders who have made commitments. Ripstop polyester construction is standard and poses no comparative advantage or disadvantage for chemical safety. The jacket's insulation system and breathability are not dependent on chemical treatments.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water with non-fluorinated detergent and avoid heat drying, which could stress seams and any surface coatings over time. water-repellent coating performance naturally degrades after 50-80 washes; reapply non-PFAS products if you choose to extend the jacket's water resistance (brands like Grangers offer PFAS-free options). Store in a breathable bag and avoid prolonged direct sunlight, which degrades polyester over years. Do not assume the water-repellent coating is food-safe or suitable for contact with skin for extended periods, though ski jacket use poses minimal exposure risk.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Mammut has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Allbirds Jackets & Coats Allbirds Full Zip Wool Blend Puffer Jacket Women Size Small

Allbirds

Jackets & Coats Allbirds Full Zip Wool Blend Puffer Jacket Women Size Small

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Wool blend with synthetic fill (likely polyester)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Allbirds Jackets & Coats Allbirds Men's Trino Puffer Jacket Full Zip Wool Blend Forest Green Coat Size Sm

Allbirds

Jackets & Coats Allbirds Men's Trino Puffer Jacket Full Zip Wool Blend Forest Green Coat Size Sm

65GoodPFAS grade
  • wool blend (natural fiber dominant)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment - undisclosed chemistry

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Allbirds NWT Womens Medium Green Natural Run Mid Layer 1/4 Zip Jacket

Allbirds

NWT Womens Medium Green Natural Run Mid Layer 1/4 Zip Jacket

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Merino wool blend (natural fiber)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic dye residue

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.