PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall53/ 100Good
Neutrogena Exfoliating Healthy Scalp Clarify & Shine Shampoo

Neutrogena · Shampoo

Neutrogena Exfoliating Healthy Scalp Clarify & Shine Shampoo

Excellent

Lower-concern choice; no known PFAS indicators in standard shampoo format, but no brand disclosure.

Verdict · BuyStandard aqueous shampoo with no established safety red flags; lower PFAS concern and no major brand controversies on record.

This water-based formula lacks water-repellent coatings, non-stick treatments, or Teflon-family coating layers common in PFAS-containing products. Neutrogena offers no PFAS-free marketing or independent lab testing.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo formulation with surfactants and conditioning agents

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Neutrogena Exfoliating Shine Shampoo is made of, ingredients and materials

This is a water-based shampoo formulation containing surfactants (likely sulfates or sulfate-free alternatives) to remove oils and debris, plus conditioning polymers and fragrance. Aqueous shampoos are inherently lower-risk than solid or silicone-heavy products because they do not concentrate hazardous compounds and rinse away completely. The 'exfoliating' claim typically signals the presence of mild physical or chemical exfoliants (scalp microbeads or salicylic acid derivatives), which have no hazard of this kind on record at standard concentrations when used as directed.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in surfactants)

Aqueous shampoos with ethoxylated surfactants may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of manufacturing. Neutrogena does not disclose dioxane testing or removal processes. Rinse-off products pose minimal dermal absorption risk, but presence is a transparency concern.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Quaternium-15, DMDM hydantoin, and imidazolidinyl urea are common preservatives in mass-market shampoos that release small amounts of formaldehyde. No ingredient disclosure on packaging confirms or rules out these agents; contact the manufacturer for specifics if sensitized to formaldehyde.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Fragrance is listed as a single ingredient without disclosure of constituent chemicals. Fragrance mixtures commonly trigger contact dermatitis or scalp irritation in sensitive individuals. If you have a history of fragrance sensitivity, patch test or request unscented alternatives.

45/ 100
⚠️

Scalp irritation from physical/chemical exfoliants

Exfoliating shampoos with microbeads or salicylic acid can cause temporary dryness, itching, or flaking if used too frequently or on compromised scalp barriers. Overuse is the primary risk; follow package frequency guidance strictly.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Shampoos typically do not require heavy metal pigments (dyes are rarely used in clear or opaque shampoos). No documented contamination or recalls for Neutrogena shampoo lines on this hazard class.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Neutrogena (owned by Kimberly-Clark) has a mixed transparency record on cosmetic ingredients. The brand does not proactively disclose PFAS presence or absence in product lines, and no formal third-party certifications (such as EWG Verified or Clean Beauty standards) are on file for this specific shampoo. No major recalls or established safety controversies specific to this product line are documented in public records.

How it compares in its category

Mass-market clarifying shampoos typically carry similar safety profiles to this product. Neutrogena's formulation is less likely to contain heavy silicones or film-forming polymers compared to premium salon brands, which reduces long-term buildup risk. Compared to natural or indie brands, Neutrogena relies on conventional synthetic surfactants and preservatives, a trade-off that prioritizes stability and cost over ingredient minimalism.

If you buy it

Use as directed (typically 1-2 times per week for clarifying formulas) to avoid scalp irritation or dryness from over-exfoliation. Rinse thoroughly with cool water to remove all residue and prevent buildup. Store in a cool, dry place to maintain formula stability. Discontinue use if scalp irritation, itching, or unusual flaking develops and switch to a gentler alternative.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Neutrogena has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More shampoo grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.