PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall8/ 100Bad
Nike NDX Turbo Distance Golf Balls

Nike Golf · Golf Balls & Equipment

Nike NDX Turbo Distance Golf Balls

Poor

Golf ball waterproof coatings often contain PFAS; Nike discloses nothing.

Verdict: SkipGolf balls carry undisclosed PFAS risk in waterproof coatings; Surlyn core itself poses no established non-PFAS hazard, but Nike's silence on chemistry warrants cautious use.

Golf ball dimple coatings commonly use water-repellent treatments that may contain PFAS. Nike provides no public information on PFAS presence or absence.

The safe swap

Maxfli Tour S Golf Balls

Maxfli

Maxfli Tour S Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Surlyn/synthetic polymer core with dimple coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Golf ball covers require water-repellent chemistry; fluorinated compounds are the dominant technology in the category. Nike's silence on this formulation, combined with industry practice, makes PFAS presence probable but unconfirmed by the brand.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🫧

Microparticle shedding from cover degradation

Golf ball covers naturally degrade through play, UV exposure, and storage. Shed polymeric particles accumulate in soil and water systems; if the coating contains PFAS or other treatments, fragmentation increases environmental and secondhand human exposure over time.

45/ 100
⚠️

Indirect ingestion by children or wildlife

Golf balls are small enough to be swallowed by young children or pets and may be mistaken for toys. While the ball itself is unlikely to cause acute toxicity, any PFAS or coatings in contact with mucous membranes pose a secondary exposure route not addressed by Nike's product guidance.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Ionomer resin (Surlyn) leaching under stress

Surlyn is a stabilized polymer and does not release monomers or plasticizers under normal play conditions. No established toxicant profile exists for this material in consumer use; the core is not a primary concern unless balls are heated or mechanically shredded.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Golf ball paints and coatings may contain trace metals, but no independent testing or recalls have documented lead, cadmium, or arsenic in consumer golf balls. This hazard is speculative without brand-specific data.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Nike NDX Turbo golf balls use a Surlyn ionomer resin core, a synthetic polymer chosen for durability and water resistance. The outer cover includes a dimple pattern coating designed to control flight and maintain performance in wet conditions. Surlyn itself is not established as a direct toxicant when ingested in normal handling, but the waterproofing treatments applied to golf ball surfaces are the primary concern, as fluorinated compounds are industry-standard in this application to repel water and extend playability.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike Golf does not publicly disclose the chemical composition of coatings on its golf balls, including whether PFAS compounds are used in waterproofing. Nike as a corporation has faced scrutiny over textile manufacturing transparency but has not issued category-specific commitments for golf equipment. No independent recalls or formal safety warnings exist for this product line, but the absence of disclosure is itself a risk signal in a category where fluorinated coatings are prevalent and unregulated at the consumer level.

How it compares in its category

Most golf balls from premium brands (Titleist, Callaway, Bridgestone) similarly use proprietary cover formulations without public PFAS declarations. Golf balls are not a food-contact or frequent skin-contact product, which lowers immediate exposure risk compared to cookware or cosmetics. However, golf balls are handled regularly and stored in bags and pockets; children may mouth them, and deteriorating covers release particles into grass and water systems, creating an indirect environmental and accumulation pathway that is not systematically monitored.

If you buy it

Wash hands after use, especially before eating. Store balls in a cool, dry place to slow cover degradation and reduce particle shedding. Replace balls when covers show visible cracking, peeling, or discoloration, as this indicates material breakdown and potential contaminant release. If children have access, supervise handling and discourage mouthing. Consider returning lost balls to a waste collection rather than leaving them in water or soil.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Nike Golf has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Nike Golf

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Synthetic rubber/elastomer golf ball core and cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Golf balls pose minimal PFAS exposure risk.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nike Golf Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

Nike Golf

Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

Rubber, synthetic polymer core; urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
🫧

Microplastic shedding during use

Limited concern

70

Golf balls present minimal PFAS exposure risk.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nike PD Soft

Nike Golf

Nike PD Soft

Surlyn ionomer cover, soft polymer core

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
🫧

Microplastic shedding during use or wear

Limited concern

70

Golf ball with standard polymers, lower concern than coated apparel.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.