PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Olaplex No.4 Fine Bond Maintenance Shampoo

Olaplex · Shampoo

Olaplex No.4 Fine Bond Maintenance Shampoo

Excellent

Low-medium risk. Rinse-off shampoo rarely needs PFAS but transparency is missing.

Verdict · BuyNo established safety issues documented; aqueous shampoo with standard surfactants poses minimal hazard if used as directed.

Olaplex No.4 is a rinse-off liquid shampoo without evidence of intentional PFAS use or waterproofing chemistry. The brand makes no PFAS disclosure either way, and no independent lab data or third-party certification is publicly available.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous liquid shampoo with surfactants

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Olaplex No.4 Fine Bond Maintenance Shampoo is made of, ingredients and materials

Olaplex No.4 is an aqueous liquid shampoo formulated with surfactants, conditioning agents, and the brand's proprietary bis-aminopropyl diglycol dimaleate (their claimed 'bond-building' active). The aqueous base and typical surfactant package (anionic and amphoteric types) are standard, low-hazard cosmetic ingredients at the concentrations used in rinse-off products. No unusual chemistry here; the product is designed to be diluted with water during use and fully rinsed away.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed)

Olaplex No.4 contains fragrance listed as a catch-all ingredient; specific allergens (e.g., limonene, linalool) are not itemized on packaging. Individuals with sensitive skin or fragrance sensitivities may experience contact dermatitis, though incidence is low for rinse-off shampoos.

70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (potential contaminant)

This shampoo likely contains ethoxylated surfactants (common in rinse-off formulas), which can contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct. No published testing of this specific product is available; regulatory limits allow trace amounts in cosmetics. Risk is minimal given brief contact and rinse-off nature.

70/ 100
⚠️

Eye irritation (typical product hazard)

Like all shampoos, accidental contact with eyes can cause mild irritation due to surfactant action. This is a use-related hazard, not a formulation defect; rinse immediately with water if contact occurs.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No publicly available information suggests this product uses formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., imidazolidinyl urea). Modern premium shampoos typically use newer preservative systems; this appears to follow that pattern.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

The product is a clear or light-colored liquid shampoo with no reported use of synthetic dyes or pigments that would introduce lead, cadmium, or chromium. No safety alerts or testing reports indicate contamination.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Olaplex has not published detailed ingredient safety data or third-party certifications (e.g., no EWG Verified, no Clean Beauty accreditation noted). The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS testing or stance, which is a transparency gap in an era when many personal care makers are moving toward PFAS-free formulations. No major safety recalls or regulatory actions against this specific product are on record. The brand has faced criticism for marketing claims, but not product safety issues.

How it compares in its category

Shampoos are typically lower-hazard personal care products because they are rinse-off, not leave-on, and the exposure window is brief. Olaplex No.4 sits in the premium mass-market segment; comparable products from brands like SheaMoisture, Bumble and bumble, or Kérastase carry similar ingredient profiles. Lack of certified organic or EWG-Verified status is common in this price tier; most conventional shampoos do not carry third-party safety audits.

If you buy it

Use as directed on the label, apply to wet hair, lather, rinse thoroughly with water. No unusual precautions needed. Discontinue use if scalp irritation or allergic reaction occurs (rare with rinse-off shampoos). Store away from extreme heat or direct sunlight to preserve formula integrity. A standard 250-400 mL bottle lasts 2-3 months with typical use; replace when empty or if separation or odor changes occur.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Olaplex has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More shampoo grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.