PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Moisturizing Shampoo

Prose · Shampoo

Moisturizing Shampoo

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern for typical liquid shampoo; no red flags but brand offers no disclosure.

Verdict: BuyWater-based shampoo with no established safety red flags; Prose lacks PFAS transparency but category risk is low. Standard precaution: verify ingredient list for personal sensitivities.

This rinse-off liquid shampoo needs no waterproofing, nonstick, or grease-resistance properties where PFAS typically appear. Prose doesn't publicly disclose PFAS avoidance or testing data.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Water-based shampoo formulation (typical, surfactants, humectants, conditioning agents)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Prose shampoos contain fragrance blends listed as 'Fragrance' or 'Parfum' on ingredient labels. Fragrance is a known trigger for contact dermatitis and scalp irritation in sensitive individuals; the specific allergen compounds are not disclosed. Risk is not unique to Prose but depends on personal skin reactivity.

70/ 100
⚠️

Scalp or eye irritation from surfactant strength

Even gentle surfactants can irritate sensitive scalp skin or eyes on contact. Prose's exact surfactant concentration and type are proprietary to customization, so irritation risk varies by formulation. Standard mitigation is to rinse thoroughly and avoid eye contact.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

1,4-dioxane (surfactant contaminant)

Liquid shampoos may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of ethoxylation in certain surfactant synthesis. No testing results or recalls specific to Prose have been published. Industry data suggest modern formulations achieve very low levels (<10 ppm), and dermal absorption from brief shampoo contact is negligible.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Prose does not list DMDM hydantoin, diazolidinyl urea, or other formaldehyde-releasing agents on publicly available ingredient disclosures for their standard moisturizing shampoo. Phenoxyethanol and sodium benzoate are more likely preservatives, which do not release formaldehyde.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Microplastic content (polyethylene beads or microfibers)

Modern shampoos generally avoid polyethylene microbeads following regulatory phase-outs (US 2015+, EU 2018+). Prose does not advertise exfoliating beads in their moisturizing line, and no evidence of microplastic content in published formulations is available.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Prose Moisturizing Shampoo is a water-based liquid formulation relying on synthetic surfactants (likely sodium lauryl sulfate or gentler alternatives) to cleanse, plus humectants such as glycerin or panthenol to retain moisture. These are stable, volatile-free ingredients at room temperature and do not degrade into hazardous byproducts during normal storage or use. Conditioning agents are typically silicones, fatty alcohols, or plant-derived polymers that deposit on hair without systemic absorption. The liquid format eliminates risks from particulate inhalation or thermal decomposition that solid or aerosol formats carry.

The brand's record and disclosure

Prose markets itself as a customized haircare brand with emphasis on ingredient transparency in marketing materials, yet does not publish comprehensive third-party certifications (such as EWG verification or Leaping Bunny) on their standard product pages. The brand has not faced documented recalls or public safety controversies related to their shampoo formulations. Prose does not publicly disclose PFAS testing or commit to PFAS-free sourcing, which is typical for mainstream haircare brands but notable given their transparency positioning.

How it compares in its category

Prose's formula sits in the mid-market segment: more ingredient-conscious marketing than drugstore brands (Pantene, Head and Shoulders) but lacking independent certifications that distinguish premium or clean-label competitors (Acure, Burt's Bees). Most mainstream liquid shampoos share similar surfactant and conditioning agent chemistries, so hazard profiles are broadly comparable. Prose's formulation risk is neither elevated nor reduced relative to equivalent price-point alternatives; differentiation is largely marketing and customization, not composition safety.

If you buy it

Store the bottle upright in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent ingredient degradation and preserve container integrity over the 12-18 month typical shelf life. Discontinue use immediately if irritation, rash, or eye reaction occurs and rinse thoroughly; patch-test the product on inner wrist or behind ear first if you have known fragrance or surfactant sensitivities. Check the full ingredient list against any personal allergens (common culprits: fragrance compounds, certain plant extracts, preservatives like sodium benzoate) before purchase, as Prose customization may introduce ingredients not present in all variants. No special disposal or safety maintenance is required; empty bottles are recyclable plastic.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Prose has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.