Puma Golf Gloves Women's Alpha Grip Gloves
Performance glove with likely water-resistant coating and no PFAS disclosure.
This glove likely has water-repellent coating or grip coating that could contain PFAS. Puma gives no public information about PFAS use or avoidance.
The better-graded swap
Maxfli
Maxfli Tour S Golf Balls
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
synthetic leather / microfiber with grip coating
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Puma Golf Gloves Women's Alpha Grip Gloves is made of, ingredients and materials
Puma Golf Gloves Alpha Grip uses synthetic leather (polyurethane or PU microfiber blend) bonded to a grip coating, typically silicone or rubber-based. Synthetic leather avoids heavy-metal tanning agents common in chrome-tanned leather, but the adhesives and surface treatments introduce chemical exposure during manufacturing and wear. The grip coating is the primary concern, water-resistant finishes on golf gloves often rely on fluorocarbon compounds (PFAS) or other hydrophobic treatments, which Puma has not publicly disclosed for this model.
What’s concerning
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
PFAS
Golf gloves require water resistance for wet conditions. Puma has not disclosed whether the Alpha Grip uses PFAS-based or alternative hydrophobic treatments; industry standard often defaults to fluorocarbon chemistry, but confirmation is absent from public sources.
Source, ATSDR ↗Formaldehyde / VOCs
Bonding synthetic leather to grip coatings typically involves formaldehyde-releasing adhesives and cross-linking resins used in fabric finishing. No test data for this specific product is publicly available; residual formaldehyde is a known concern in synthetic textiles, especially those with coatings.
Source, ATSDR ↗Microplastic shedding from grip coating degradation
Grip coatings can degrade with use and washing, especially on polyurethane-based materials. Worn gloves may shed microparticles, though direct skin ingestion risk is low; environmental release is the primary concern over extended product lifespan.
Skin sensitization from residual dyes or finishes
Direct skin contact with dyed synthetic leather and coated surfaces carries low but non-zero risk of contact dermatitis, especially in individuals with sensitive skin. Pre-washing can reduce residual chemical burden before use.
What’s reassuring
Azo dyes in synthetic leather or grip coating
Synthetic leather and grip coatings may use azo dyes during manufacturing. No specific documentation of azo-dye use or restrictions in Puma golf gloves is on record; industry practice varies widely.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Puma has not made public commitments to PFAS-free manufacturing or disclosed water-resistance chemistry for its golf glove line. The brand does maintain general sustainability communications but lacks third-party certifications (OEKO-TEX, GOTS, Bluesign) for apparel products that would independently verify chemical restrictions. No significant recalls or health controversies have been documented for Puma golf gloves specifically, but the brand's silence on coating composition is a transparency gap.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves occupy a niche with minimal regulatory oversight compared to base apparel. Puma's synthetic-leather approach is industry standard and has lower concern than leather alternatives that may contain chromium or other tanning residues. Competitors like Titleist and FootJoy similarly do not disclose grip-coating chemistry publicly; few brands have committed to PFAS-free sports gloves. This product falls into the typical mid-range transparency tier for performance athletic wear.
If you buy it
Wash gloves in cool water with mild detergent before first use to reduce residual dyes and finishes. Avoid prolonged heat exposure (direct sunlight storage, washing machines above 30°C) as synthetic leather and coatings may degrade and shed microparticles. Replace when grip coating visibly wears (typically 1-2 seasons of regular play) rather than continuing use on degraded material. Store in dry conditions to prevent mold and bacterial growth, which is more likely in damp synthetic textiles.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Puma has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Puma Golf Gloves Women's Alpha Grip Gloves?
- Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Graphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- Cabretta leather, likely tannin-tanned
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- leather or synthetic leather with cotton lining
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore golf balls & equipment grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.