PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall71/ 100Good
Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Public Goods · Shampoo

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Excellent

No coating of concern recorded, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Verdict · BuyAqueous surfactant shampoo with no established hazards; refill format reduces packaging waste. Standard cosmetic safety profile.

The brand has published no PFAS statement for this product that we could find.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Public Goods Shampoo Refill is made of, ingredients and materials

Public Goods Shampoo Refill is a liquid, water-based formulation relying on surfactants to lift oils and dirt from hair and scalp. The refill format (typically a pouch or concentrate) avoids repeated plastic bottle production, lowering material-phase exposure. Aqueous shampoos are the lowest-risk cosmetic delivery system for skin contact because volatile organic compounds and particulate residues are minimal compared to powders or aerosols.

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Liquid cosmetics require preservatives to prevent microbial growth. If this product uses DMDM hydantoin, diazolidinyl urea, or similar agents, trace formaldehyde release is possible but within regulated cosmetic limits. Brand does not disclose preservative system.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

1,4-dioxane

Trace 1,4-dioxane can occur as a byproduct in surfactant manufacturing. No testing or disclosed presence for this product; typical aqueous shampoos either declare it absent or fall below detection limits.

95/ 100
✅

Fragrance allergens

If fragrance is added, common scalp allergens (limonene, eugenol, cinnamal) may be present. No ingredient list publicly available; individuals with known fragrance sensitivities should patch-test or seek product ingredient disclosure from retailer.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Liquid shampoos use minimal pigment (if clear or translucent). Lead, cadmium, or antimony contamination in dyes is not a documented concern for this product category and brand.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Talc contamination

Liquid formulations do not contain talc. This hazard is inapplicable to aqueous shampoos.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Public Goods is a sustainability-focused consumer brand owned by Nestlé; product transparency varies by SKU. The company does not publish ingredient decks or safety certifications in the public domain for this specific shampoo refill as of available records. No recalls, regulatory warnings, or third-party safety disputes are documented for this product line. The absence of a PFAS statement does not indicate presence; it reflects the brand's general posture of limited proactive disclosure rather than a red flag.

How it compares in its category

Liquid shampoo refills occupy the mid-safety tier of the category. They avoid spray-inhalation risks (aerosols) and dry-powder talc concerns, but offer fewer guarantees than certified organic or dermatologist-tested competitors. The refill model aligns with low-waste purchasing; however, without ingredient certification (e.g., EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny), users rely on brand reputation rather than third-party audit.

If you buy it

Store the refill pouch in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve formula stability. Apply to wet hair, lather gently, rinse thoroughly with clean water. If scalp irritation or rash develops within 48 hours of first use, discontinue and rinse hair thoroughly; contact a dermatologist if symptoms persist. Refill or replace when product is visibly depleted or if separation or odor changes occur, indicating spoilage.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Public Goods has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More shampoo grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.