PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Rahua Aloe Vera Shampoo

Rahua · Shampoo

Rahua Aloe Vera Shampoo

Excellent

Lower concern, liquid cosmetics rarely need PFAS; no red flags identified.

Verdict: BuyAqueous shampoo with no established safety red flags; botanical formulation and PFAS score support low-risk profile for typical use.

This liquid shampoo has no PFAS-prone coatings, treatments, or water-resistance claims typical of the category. No third-party testing signals enhanced safety, but liquid cosmetics pose lower risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo with botanical extracts

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Botanical shampoos typically include essential oils and natural fragrance compounds; while often marketed as safer, these can trigger contact dermatitis or sensitization in 1-5% of users. No specific allergen list is publicly available for this product.

70/ 100
⚠️

Scalp irritation from surfactant load or pH imbalance

Botanical shampoos sometimes compromise cleansing power by reducing surfactant strength, leading to incomplete rinsing and buildup, or conversely use high-pH formulations that disrupt scalp barrier function. Rahua's specific pH and ionic strength are not publicly disclosed.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Aqueous shampoos typically use mild preservatives (e.g., phenoxyethanol, methylisothiazolinone) rather than formaldehyde donors. No recalls or complaints linking Rahua shampoos to formaldehyde contamination are documented.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

1,4-dioxane contamination

This contaminant arises from surfactant synthesis and is not inherent to aloe or botanical extracts. No testing or regulatory action against Rahua products indicates problematic levels, though small trace amounts can occur in any shampoo using ethoxylated surfactants.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Aloe vera extract itself does not require synthetic colorants; natural shades are achieved via the plant material. No credible reports of lead, cadmium, or arsenic in this product exist.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Rahua Aloe Vera Shampoo is a liquid, water-based formulation typical of botanical-positioned shampoos. The product contains aloe vera extract as a humectant and skin-conditioning agent, combined with standard surfactants and preservative systems. Liquid aqueous cosmetics do not require PFAS for solubility or texture, so the absence of fluorinated compounds is chemically unsurprising. The botanical positioning implies minimal synthetic colorants and fragrance allergen load, though specific ingredient disclosures are not available from public labeling alone.

The brand's record and disclosure

Rahua is a luxury botanical haircare brand with a sustainability and indigenous-partnership narrative, but maintains limited public transparency on full ingredient safety or third-party certifications. No major recalls, controversies, or safety violations are on record for this product or brand. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS avoidance policies, though the aqueous formulation makes avoidance the default. No independent lab testing or certification (e.g., EWG Verified) is documented for this specific shampoo.

How it compares in its category

Botanical shampoos like this sit in the mid-to-premium segment where fragrance complexity and natural extract positioning create both appeal and higher allergen variability than mass-market alternatives. Compared to sulfate-free and clean-label competitors (e.g., Acure, Briogeo), Rahua offers similar safety profiles but less public ingredient granularity. Versus conventional supermarket shampoos, it avoids silicone build-up risks and typically uses gentler surfactant blends, reducing scalp irritation potential.

If you buy it

Use as directed on damp hair; no special storage precautions are required beyond keeping the bottle sealed and away from extreme heat. Liquid shampoos have indefinite shelf life if stored at room temperature. Discontinue use immediately if you experience scalp irritation, redness, or allergic reaction, as fragrance or botanical extracts can trigger sensitivity in vulnerable populations. Patch test on a small scalp area if you have a history of contact dermatitis or fragrance sensitivity.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rahua has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.