Redken Frizz Dismiss Shampoo
Lower concern for PFAS with no known water-repellent or nonstick treatment.
This rinse-off shampoo has no functional need for PFAS since it requires no waterproofing or nonstick treatment. Redken has not voluntarily verified PFAS-free status, and exposure from a rinse-off product would be minimal.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
Water-based shampoo with silicones and conditioning agents
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
No PFAS disclosure
The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)
Water-based shampoos may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of ethoxylation in surfactants. Redken does not publicly disclose 1,4-dioxane testing or removal on this product; the concentration, if present, is typically below 10 ppm and is not a documented recall trigger for mainstream shampoos.
Preservative sensitization (methylchloroisothiazolinone and related)
Mainstream shampoos including Redken products commonly use preservatives such as methylisothiazolinone. Rare allergic contact dermatitis has been documented in sensitive individuals; incidence is low but not zero. Patch testing or ingredient checking is advisable if scalp reactions develop.
Silicone accumulation on hair
High silicone content in rinse-off shampoos can deposit on hair over repeated use, especially in fine or thin hair, leading to buildup and weight. This is a cosmetic concern rather than a health hazard, but may necessitate periodic clarification or switching products for long-term users.
Fragrance allergen undisclosure
The product contains fragrance listed as a single ingredient without breakdown of components. Fragrance blends can include known allergens such as limonene, linalool, or cinnamyl alcohol; individuals with fragrance sensitivity should perform a patch test or request full fragrance composition from the manufacturer.
What’s reassuring
Safe base material
Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.
Heavy metals
No documented concerns or recalls involving heavy metals in this shampoo formulation. Cosmetic colorants in shampoos are regulated, and Redken is subject to FDA oversight; no specific testing has flagged contamination in this product line.
Source: FDA ↗The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Redken Frizz Dismiss Shampoo is a water-based formulation containing silicones (likely dimethicone or similar) and conditioning agents designed to coat and seal the hair cuticle. Silicones in rinse-off products are not absorbed into skin or systemically, and are rinsed away with water, making exposure minimal. The formula also includes surfactants and preservatives typical of mainstream shampoos; these are regulated ingredients at approved concentrations.
The brand's record and disclosure
Redken is owned by L'Oreal and operates under cosmetic industry standards but does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing or third-party safety certifications on this product. The brand has no documented recalls or major safety controversies tied to this shampoo line. Ingredient transparency is limited to the standard label; L'Oreal-owned brands generally comply with FDA and EU cosmetic regulations but do not voluntarily exceed them.
How it compares in its category
Frizz Dismiss Shampoo is a mainstream conditioning shampoo with a silicone-heavy profile, typical of mass-market anti-frizz products. It does not carry eco or clean-beauty certifications and sits in the conventional segment rather than natural or hypoallergenic tiers. For users with silicone sensitivity or preference for silicone-free formulas, alternatives exist; for general use, safety profile is consistent with comparable drugstore brands.
If you buy it
Use as directed: wet hair, apply, lather, rinse thoroughly with water. No special precautions are needed; the product is designed for rinse-off and poses no heat or storage hazards. If scalp irritation or hair buildup occurs after weeks of use, consider switching to a clarifying shampoo occasionally or testing a silicone-free alternative. Store in a cool, dry place and replace when empty or if separation occurs.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Redken has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Safer alternatives in Shampoo
Credo Beauty
Roz Salt Scalp Scrub
salt crystals, mineral-based scrub
Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components
Limited concern
Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape
Moderate concern
Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Puracy
Public Goods Shampoo Refill
aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo
1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)
Limited concern
Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)
Limited concern
Bacterial or mold growth in refill container
Limited concern
Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Puracy
Natural Shampoo
aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers
1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)
Limited concern
Fragrance allergens and sensitizers
Limited concern
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Limited concern
Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.
⚠Risky category by default
More shampoo grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.