PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall8/ 100Bad
Rimmel London 100% Waterproof Mascara

Rimmel · Waterproof Mascara

Rimmel London 100% Waterproof Mascara

Poor

Waterproof mascara; PFAS risk unclear without ingredient disclosure.

Verdict · SkipWaterproof mascara with undisclosed waterproofing agent and PFAS risk; brand silent on both. Use with eye area caution; remove fully daily.

Rimmel does not disclose waterproofing chemistry or PFAS status. Waterproof cosmetics often use Teflon-family coating or PFAS-based ingredients, but this product's formula is opaque.

The better-graded swap

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

wax, film-forming polymers, waterproofing agent unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Rimmel London 100% Waterproof Mascara is made of, ingredients and materials

Rimmel's 100% Waterproof Mascara uses wax and film-forming polymers as the base, standard for long-wear products. The waterproofing agent is not named on the label or in publicly available safety data, which is the primary concern, waterproofing in cosmetics often involves silicones or synthetic polymers that require specific removal steps. Wax itself is inert, but the unlisted waterproofing polymer cannot be assessed for eye safety without full ingredient disclosure.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed waterproofing polymer

The specific waterproofing agent is not listed on packaging or in public ingredient disclosures. Without knowing whether it is silicone, acrylate, or another polymer, eye irritation or allergic sensitization risk cannot be fully assessed. Some synthetic polymers used in waterproof cosmetics can accumulate on the lid if not fully removed.

70/ 100
⚠️

Eye irritation from incomplete removal

Waterproof formulas are designed to resist water and are inherently harder to remove than conventional mascara. Buildup from repeated application without full removal is a primary complaint with waterproof mascaras and can lead to contact dermatitis or folliculitis on the lash line.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives or known allergen preservatives are publicly documented for this product. Standard mascaras use DMDM hydantoin or imidazolidinyl urea rarely; Rimmel's formula is not detailed enough to confirm or rule this out definitively.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Iron oxides and synthetic colorants in black mascara are typically low-migration and regulated by cosmetic law. No recalls or testing reports document heavy metal contamination in Rimmel mascara products.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Fragrance allergens

Rimmel mascara formulations are not typically fragrance-heavy, and no specific fragrance allergen incidents are recorded. Eye-area products carry lower fragrance load than skin care, reducing sensitization risk.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Rimmel London (owned by Coty Inc.) has not published transparency reports on PFAS use or broader chemical disclosure policies. The product label lists no waterproofing agent by name, making independent hazard assessment impossible. No recalls or formal safety controversies specific to this mascara are on record. The brand does not hold third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, Cruelty-Free) that would indicate higher disclosure standards.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof mascaras across brands typically rely on silicones, acrylates, or (rarely) Teflon-type coating-based polymers to achieve water resistance. Rimmel's refusal to name the waterproofing agent is less transparent than brands that specify 'silicone-based' or list polymers by INCI name. Non-waterproof mascaras and those with named, well-studied polymers (e.g., acrylates) are easier to assess for eye irritation risk. This product sits in the middle-tier budget range with lower transparency than prestige or indie brands.

If you buy it

Remove mascara completely each evening with appropriate makeup remover or oil to prevent buildup and eye irritation; waterproof formulas require deliberate removal effort. Do not sleep in it. If you experience eye redness, stinging, or irritation after application, discontinue use and rinse thoroughly with water. Replace mascara every 3 months to avoid bacterial contamination. Avoid application if you have known sensitivities to acrylates or silicones, since you cannot confirm which is used here.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rimmel has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Rimmel London 100% Waterproof Mascara?

Burt's Bees 100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

Burt's Bees

100% Natural Nourishing Mascara, Black Brown

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Wax, pigments, natural oils (typical mascara base)
  • Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Chanel Le Volume de Chanel Mascara

Chanel

Le Volume de Chanel Mascara

65GoodPFAS grade
  • pigments, waxes, polymers (unspecified)
  • Lead

5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Estée Lauder Lash Drama Mascara Gift Set

Estée Lauder

Lash Drama Mascara Gift Set

65GoodPFAS grade
  • pigments, waxes, film-formers in liquid mascara
  • Heavy metals

5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More waterproof mascara grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.