PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Shaw Sample Carbon Copy Carpet Tile SP704

Shaw Industries · Carpets & Rugs

Shaw Sample Carbon Copy Carpet Tile SP704

Poor

Avoid until Shaw discloses its stain-treatment formula or provides independent testing.

Verdict: SkipNylon tile with undisclosed stain treatment and poor PFAS safety; acceptable only if you avoid water-based cleaning and replace within 5-7 years.

Carbon Copy carpet tile includes stain and soil resistance but Shaw provides no public record of its coating chemistry. Carpet treatments represent a known PFAS exposure pathway.

The safe swap

Victoria Rug Classic / 2x4 / Hearth Rust

Victoria Carpets

Victoria Rug Classic / 2x4 / Hearth Rust

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/synthetic fiber blend with unspecified stain/soil resistance treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Carpet stain guards often use melamine or urea-formaldehyde resins to bond soil resistance. Shaw's formula is not disclosed; formaldehyde releasers are common in this product class and off-gas for weeks to months after installation.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compounds (VOC) from synthetic fibers and treatments

Nylon tiles with applied chemical treatments typically emit VOCs during and after installation. Shaw does not certify this product for low-VOC or publish emissions data; off-gassing is standard for untreated synthetic carpet tiles in this category.

20/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from fiber breakdown

Nylon carpet tiles shed microfibers naturally over time, accelerated by foot traffic and aging. Shaw's stain coating may reduce but does not prevent shedding; inhalation and accumulation in dust are documented exposure pathways for carpet-based microplastics.

45/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed stain-treatment chemistry

The specific soil-resistance or water-repellent agent is not public; this prevents assessment of PFAS risk or other fluorinated compounds. Industry practice often includes perfluorinated or siloxane-based treatments in this product class.

20/ 100
⛏️

Backing adhesive leachates

Carpet tile backing typically uses polyurethane or styrene-based adhesives. Heat, moisture, or aggressive cleaning can mobilize residual monomers or plasticizers; Shaw does not disclose backing formulation.

70/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Shaw Sample Carbon Copy SP704 is a nylon-synthetic blend carpet tile designed for commercial or heavy-residential use. Nylon is durable and stain-resistant by nature, but manufacturers typically apply additional soil-release or stain-guard treatments to extend performance. Shaw has not publicly disclosed the chemistry of the treatment on this specific tile, which is the core safety concern. The unspecified formulation creates uncertainty about presence of PFAS, formaldehyde resins, or other volatile additives.

The brand's record and disclosure

Shaw Industries is a major carpet manufacturer but maintains minimal transparency on chemical treatments in its product lines. The company has not issued public statements on PFAS phase-out or independent testing of stain treatments. Shaw holds some sustainability certifications (GreenLabel Plus, ISO standards) but these do not address stain-treatment chemistry. The silent stance on formula disclosure is a documented pattern across their consumer-grade carpet tiles.

How it compares in its category

Carpet tiles in the mid-market commercial segment typically carry stain treatments; Shaw's lack of transparency is standard for this tier, not exceptional. Brands like Interface and some Mohawk lines publish treatment ingredient lists or commit to PFAS-free formulas, setting a higher bar. Budget tiles from unknown manufacturers often carry the same disclosure gaps but may have fewer safety audits. This product sits in the gray middle: established brand, no worse than peer products, but no better on chemical transparency.

If you buy it

Vacuum weekly and avoid steam cleaning or water-based extraction methods, which can reactivate or mobilize soil-treatment chemistry. Use dry or low-moisture spot cleaning only. Plan for replacement within 5 to 7 years, as nylon backing and stain coatings degrade and shed microfibers with age. Install over a low-VOC or untreated underlayment to minimize off-gassing in the first 2-3 months; ventilate well during and after installation.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 38% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Shaw Industries has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Carpets & Rugs

Rug Doctor Max Advanced Deep Carpet Cleaner

Rug Doctor

Max Advanced Deep Carpet Cleaner

Aqueous cleaning solution, surfactants, water

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
⚠️

Surfactant skin and eye irritation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Residue buildup on carpet fibers

Limited concern

70

Liquid cleaner with no known PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Rug Doctor X3 Commercial Carpet Cleaner Pro Oxy Pack

Rug Doctor

X3 Commercial Carpet Cleaner Pro Oxy Pack

Enzymatic and oxygen-based carpet cleaning solution

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade63Good
⚠️

Enzyme sensitization and respiratory irritation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Surfactant irritation (skin and mucous membrane)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Residual buildup with repeated use

Limited concern

70

Liquid cleaner with no known PFAS risk factors identified.

Risky category by default

Rug Doctor Pet TruDeep Cleaner

Rug Doctor

Pet TruDeep Cleaner

Carpet cleaning machine, plastic/metal/motor components

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade63Good
⚠️

Bacterial and mold growth in water systems

Limited concern

70
💨

Motor emissions and particulate inhalation

Limited concern

70

Plasticizer migration from hose or seal degradation

Limited concern

70

Limited PFAS risk as cleaning machine, but brand discloses nothing.

Risky category by default

More carpets & rugs grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.