PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall8/ 100Bad
Nubuck Suede & Fabric Waterproofer

· Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

Nubuck Suede & Fabric Waterproofer

Poor

Skip this waterproofer; brand won't reveal PFAS chemistry.

Verdict · Skipwater-repellent coating waterproofer likely contains undisclosed PFAS; non-PFAS hazards minimal if applied correctly. Use sparingly, ensure ventilation, replace when water beads fade.

The North Face waterproofer spray contains no PFAS information from the brand. water-repellent coating treatments traditionally use PFAS, though alternatives now exist.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

water-repellent coating-treated nubuck suede and fabric coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The North Face has not disclosed PFAS-free certification for this product. water-repellent coating waterproofers in this price and performance tier almost universally use fluorinated chemistry. PFAS accumulates in soil and water with each application and wash.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
💨

Inhalation risk from spray aerosol

Improper application indoors or in confined spaces may expose lungs to fine particulate matter and volatile components of the formulation. Use only outdoors or in well-ventilated areas to minimize respiratory exposure.

70/ 100

Nubuck finish degradation from product buildup

Suede and nubuck are delicate naps that can become stiff or discolored if waterproofer is applied too heavily or unevenly. Light, even coats and spot testing on hidden areas are standard practice to preserve texture and appearance.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No specific testing or recalls document formaldehyde or high-VOC content in this North Face product. Modern aerosol waterproofers typically use low-VOC propellants, but formulation data is not publicly available for independent verification.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Waterproof coatings for fabric do not typically include pigments or colorants that would introduce lead or cadmium. No public health warnings or recalls have been issued for this product class.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) spray coating applied to nubuck suede and woven fabrics. water-repellent coating treatments historically rely on PFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS) to create water-beading properties that last through wear. The North Face has not publicly committed to PFAS-free alternatives for this product line, and the brand's silence on formulation chemistry suggests conventional fluorinated water-repellent coating is likely present. Nubuck itself is leather with a fine nap finish; the risk from the fabric substrate is minimal, but the coating chemistry is the concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face has made incremental sustainability statements but has not published independent water-repellent coating chemistry disclosure for consumer products. The brand has not signed the Cradle to Cradle or PFC-Free certification for this waterproofer line. No product-specific PFAS recalls or regulatory warnings exist on record, but the absence of disclosure is itself a red flag in an industry where competitors (Arc'teryx, Patagonia) have committed to PFAS-phase-out roadmaps. The North Face's silence on this product specifically contrasts with their parent company VF Corp's 2025 PFC reduction pledge, suggesting legacy formulations may remain in stock.

How it compares in its category

Suede and fabric waterproofers span a wide hazard spectrum. Paraffin-based and silicone-based alternatives exist but are less durable; most commercial sprays still use short-chain PFAS as the de facto standard for performance. The North Face product is typical in this regard, neither worse nor better than unnamed competitors. If PFAS avoidance is your priority, certified PFAS-free options (Nikwax TX Direct, some Sawyer treatments) exist but require more frequent reapplication and work better on synthetic fabrics than suede.

If you buy it

Apply in a well-ventilated outdoor space or garage to avoid inhaling aerosol particles; do not spray indoors. Allow garments to dry fully (2-4 hours) before wearing. The coating degrades with abrasion and washing; reapply every 6-12 months or when water no longer beads visibly on the fabric. Do not use heat to accelerate drying, as this may affect both the nubuck nap and coating adhesion. Store the spray can upright in a cool place and away from direct sunlight; dispose of empty cans according to local aerosol regulations.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Fabric Stain Guard Sprays

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather

Nikwax

Waterproofing Wax for Leather

wax-based waterproofing

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade51Good
💨

Respiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application

Limited concern

70
♾️

PFAS

Moderate concern

45

A water-repellent or grease-resistant treatment of unstated chemistry, with a brand PFAS statement we have not verified.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Timberland Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

Timberland

Waximum Waxed Leather Protector

Wax-based leather protector

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade39Poor
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvents

High concern

20
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Skin sensitization from undisclosed additives

Limited concern

70

Wax coating lower concern than synthetic waterproofing, but unconfirmed.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Angelus Mink Oil Paste Leather Waterproofer and Contitioner 3 oz

Angelus

Mink Oil Paste Leather Waterproofer and Contitioner 3 oz

mink oil paste, natural oil-based conditioner

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
⚠️

Microbial growth (natural oil rancidity)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin sensitization (mink oil allergenicity)

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; natural oil product unlikely to contain PFAS but unverified.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More fabric stain guard sprays grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.