PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall4/ 100Bad
GT48 Gray Padded Artificial Turf

· Artificial Turf

GT48 Gray Padded Artificial Turf

Poor

Synthetic turf backing composition unknown, no PFAS disclosure available.

Verdict · SkipUnknown PFAS risk plus typical synthetic turf VOC/flame-retardant concerns warrant cautious use with ventilation; brand transparency is minimal.

TigerTurf keeps PFAS and chemical content private for this product. Artificial turf backings often hide adhesives and coatings that may include PFAS, leaving risk unassessed.

The better-graded swap

LITA Greenfield Artificial Grass Turf Cut to Length 0.7in Pile Height Rubber

LITA

LITA Greenfield Artificial Grass Turf Cut to Length 0.7in Pile Height Rubber

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyethylene or polypropylene backing, synthetic fibers, adhesive composition undisclosed

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
⚠️

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from adhesive and backing

Synthetic turf adhesives and polyethylene/polypropylene backing commonly release formaldehyde, toluene, and other VOCs during cure and early use. TigerTurf provides no off-gassing data; typical padded turf products show elevated VOC levels in first weeks post-installation.

20/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Synthetic fibers and padding may contain flame-retardant chemicals (brominated or chlorinated compounds, antimony) to meet flammability standards, but TigerTurf does not specify. Industry standard practice but not disclosed here, making individual product hazard assessment impossible.

Source, EPA
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microplastic shedding over time

Synthetic turf fibers naturally shed microplastics, especially under foot traffic or UV exposure. Padded turf with adhesive-bonded backing can accelerate fiber separation as adhesive degrades; no TigerTurf-specific data available but typical for this product class.

45/ 100
⚠️

Moisture retention and mold/bacterial growth in padding

Padded turf backing can retain moisture if not properly drained, creating conditions for mold, mildew, or bacterial colonization, especially in humid climates. No maintenance guidance is provided by TigerTurf, increasing this risk in poor-drainage installations.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No publicly available testing or recalls cite lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in TigerTurf GT48 fibers. Standard polyethylene/polypropylene fiber dyes are typically heavy-metal-free but cannot be verified without manufacturer testing.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

GT48 uses polyethylene or polypropylene synthetic fibers over a backing (composition undisclosed) bonded with adhesive of unknown formulation. This construction is standard for padded artificial turf but creates multiple potential off-gassing pathways, the fibers themselves, the backing material, and especially the adhesive layer can release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during manufacturing, installation, and early use. The padding and adhesive are the highest-risk components for chemical leaching, particularly in warm or humid conditions.

The brand's record and disclosure

TigerTurf has published no publicly available safety data sheet, material transparency statement, or third-party certifications (e.g., GreenGuard, FloorScore) for this product. The brand does not disclose adhesive composition or backing material specifics, which is standard practice for many synthetic turf manufacturers but limits independent hazard assessment. No major recalls or safety violations are on record for TigerTurf products, but the silence on chemical composition reflects an industry norm rather than reassurance.

How it compares in its category

Padded artificial turf sits at the higher end of off-gassing risk compared to non-adhesive modular turf or natural grass. Many competitors (e.g., FieldTurf, Mondo) offer certified low-VOC or third-party-tested products; TigerTurf does not advertise equivalent certifications for GT48. Budget synthetic turfs typically trade chemical disclosure for lower cost, making GT48 typical of its market segment but not a leader in transparency or documented safety testing.

If you buy it

Install in a well-ventilated space and allow 48-72 hours of air circulation before heavy use to minimize VOC inhalation. Avoid placement in direct sun or heat sources (>50°C ambient) as polymer backing and adhesive can off-gas more aggressively when warm. Inspect annually for adhesive degradation, cracking fibers, or visible moisture retention; replace if backing separates or fibers shed excessively. Not recommended for enclosed spaces without mechanical ventilation or for children's play areas without off-site testing of VOC emissions.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Artificial Turf

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

AstroTurf

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

Polypropylene (PP) astroturf

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade35Poor
💨

VOC off-gassing from polyurethane or latex adhesive

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polypropylene UV degradation and microplastic shedding

High concern

20
⚠️

Backing adhesive failure and fiber separation

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Infill contamination (if rubber granules used)

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; polypropylene rarely requires PFAS, but no brand disclosure on treatments.

Starting grade for this product type

LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length

LITA

ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length

Synthetic turf fibers (polyethylene/polypropylene backing)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade53Good
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from fibers

Moderate concern

45
⛏️

Leaching from backing polymers or adhesives

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Infill contamination (if sand or crumb used)

Limited concern

70

Wait for brand to disclose turf composition; synthetic turf historically may use PFAS.

Starting grade for this product type

Multi Sport Turf

Multi Sport Turf

synthetic turf (polyethylene/polypropylene fibers, infill material unspecified)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade49Poor
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Undisclosed infill composition and leachates

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Fiber degradation and microplastic generation

Limited concern

70
💨

Volatile organic compound off-gassing during installation

Limited concern

70

Insufficient brand disclosure.

Starting grade for this product type

More artificial turf grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.