PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall53/ 100Good
Verb Dandruff Shampoo

Verb · Shampoo

Verb Dandruff Shampoo

Excellent

Lower concern; typical liquid shampoo with no known PFAS pathway, but brand offers no transparency.

Verdict · BuyStandard cosmetic shampoo with no established safety red flags; brand transparency modest but no known recalls or contamination issues reported.

This aqueous cosmetic lacks the water-resistant, stain-resistant, or nonstick properties that require PFAS. Verb doesn't publicly disclose PFAS avoidance; review ingredients for any fluorinated compounds.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo solution; standard cosmetic preservatives and surfactants

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Verb Dandruff Shampoo is made of, ingredients and materials

Verb Dandruff Shampoo is an aqueous surfactant-based formulation designed to address scalp flaking via anti-dandruff actives (likely zinc pyrithione or salicylic acid, common in this category). The product contains standard cosmetic preservatives and emulsifiers typical of mass-market liquid shampoos. Aqueous solutions present minimal risk for leaching or degradation compared to solid formulations or those with volatile components.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (preservative contaminant)

Liquid shampoos sometimes contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of ethoxylated surfactants, though modern manufacturing controls limit this. No specific test results for Verb Dandruff Shampoo are publicly available; typical commercial shampoos show minimal to undetectable levels if well-manufactured.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Some preservative systems (e.g., imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin) release small amounts of formaldehyde. Verb's ingredient list would need to be cross-checked; many mainstream brands have phased these out in favor of gentler systems, but absence of public disclosure prevents certainty here.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Shampoos include fragrance compounds to mask the odor of actives and preservatives. Verb does not disclose fragrance ingredient breakdown on typical retail labeling. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or scalp inflammation should perform patch testing before full use.

70/ 100
⚠️

Scalp irritation from active ingredients

Dandruff shampoo actives (zinc pyrithione, salicylic acid) are well-established but can cause drying, burning, or contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. This is a known category risk, not specific to Verb, but worth monitoring during initial use.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Shampoos typically contain minimal added pigments; dandruff shampoos are usually opaque white or light yellow from actives and suspended minerals, not synthetic colorants. No specific contamination reports exist for Verb products in this category.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Verb is a consumer haircare brand without major publicly documented recalls or safety controversies on record. The brand does not actively promote third-party certifications (e.g., EWG verification, cruelty-free badges) or publish detailed ingredient sourcing and safety data sheets. Product labeling includes a standard ingredient list but lacks extended transparency statements on preservative systems or heavy metal testing, which is typical, though not exceptional, for the category.

How it compares in its category

Dandruff shampoos vary widely in active-ingredient choice and preservative robustness. Verb's formulation sits in the mainstream commercial tier, neither premium (with third-party testing) nor budget basement (with higher contamination risk historically). Competitors like Head and Shoulders and Nizoral have more extensive safety documentation; indie brands sometimes offer cleaner preservative profiles but less regulatory oversight.

If you buy it

Use as directed on the label, typically 2-3 times weekly; avoid leaving concentrate on scalp for extended periods to minimize irritation risk. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve preservative efficacy. Discontinue use if rash, burning, or unusual flaking develops and consult a dermatologist. Replace bottle if seal is compromised or product shows visible discoloration or separation.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Verb has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More shampoo grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.