All 13 fast-casual food packaging we scored fail our PFAS screen

We scored 13 fast-casual food packaging for PFAS forever chemicals and other hazards, then ranked them safest first. Every score below links to the full breakdown of what earned it.

How to read these scores. PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Each grade is a model-based assessment built from published ingredient lists, materials, certifications, brand disclosures, recalls and third-party lab results where they exist. Read the full rubric to see exactly what adds and removes points.
100% of the 13 fast-casual food packaging we scored fail our PFAS and toxin screen.
PFAS Authority, September 2026. Free to cite with a link. See the full dataset.

The safest PFAS-free fast-casual food packaging we have scored

Nothing in this category clears our buy threshold yet. That is the finding, not a gap.

The fast-casual food packaging we would skip

Lowest scoring in this category, worst first.

Burger King Sandwich Wrapper Cheeseburger Lot Of 2 Vtg 70s Food

Burger King

Sandwich Wrapper Cheeseburger Lot Of 2 Vtg 70s Food

Paper with grease-resistant coating (unspecified)

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade3Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🍳

Unknown additive content in vintage coating

Moderate concern

45

Paper substrate degradation over decades

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Skip. Vintage 1970s wrapper likely PFAS-coated for grease protection.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Fast Food Wrapping Paper

Burger King

Fast Food Wrapping Paper

paper with grease-resistant coating, composition unspecified

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade0Bad
♾️

PFAS

High concern

20

Coating degradation and leaching during heat or moisture exposure

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Undisclosed chemical additives in coating formulation

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Bioaccumulation risk from repeated exposure

Limited concern

70

Skip. Grease-resistant coatings often contain PFAS without transparency.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

1979, Burger King Paper Cheeseburger Wrapper (Scarce / Vintage)

Burger King

1979, Burger King Paper Cheeseburger Wrapper (Scarce / Vintage)

paper with grease-resistant coating (composition unknown)

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade0Bad
🍳

Unknown grease-resistant coating leachates

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation and particulate release

High concern

20
⚠️

Microbial or mold growth

Limited concern

70
🍳

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from aged coating

Limited concern

70

Vintage 1979 wrapper. PFAS history in packaging remains unclear.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

What we check on fast-casual food packaging

  • Confirmed PFAS, PTFE or fluoropolymer content, which is the heaviest penalty we apply.
  • Stain, water or grease resistant treatments, which usually mean fluorinated chemistry.
  • Whether the brand discloses what is in the product, or stays silent behind a “clean” claim.
  • Independent lab results and certifications where they exist.

Full point-by-point rubric on the methodology page.

The fast-casual food packaging brands that will not say

4 of the brands here publish nothing about PFAS at all. Silence is not evidence of harm, but it is why none of them score well on disclosure.

Burger King, Cava, Chick-fil-A, Panda Express.

Common questions about PFAS-free fast-casual food packaging

Is fast-casual food packaging PFAS free?

Mostly not. Of the 13 fast-casual food packaging we have scored, 100% fail our PFAS and toxin screen, which leaves 0 that pass. The lowest is Burger King Burger King Sandwich Wrapper Cheeseburger Lot Of 2 Vtg 70s Food at 25.

Which fast-casual food packaging should I avoid?

The three lowest scoring we hold are Burger King Burger King Sandwich Wrapper Cheeseburger Lot Of 2 Vtg 70s Food at 25, Burger King Fast Food Wrapping Paper at 25, Burger King 1979, Burger King Paper Cheeseburger Wrapper (Scarce / Vintage) at 25. The problem with the first is that skip. Vintage 1970s wrapper likely PFAS-coated for grease protection.

Which fast-casual food packaging brands will not say whether they use PFAS?

4 of the brands we scored in this category publish nothing about PFAS at all, including Burger King, Cava, Chick-fil-A, Panda Express. Silence is not evidence of harm, but it is the reason those brands cannot score well on disclosure.

Do you lab test fast-casual food packaging?

No. We score from published ingredient lists, materials, certifications, disclosures and third party lab results where they exist. Where a product has been independently tested we use that result and say so.

Get the safe list, free

The products we score each week, and the safest alternative in every category.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Does a particular brand of fast-casual food packaging have PFAS?

Want to filter the whole category yourself? Browse all 13 fast-casual food packaging.