PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall17/ 100Bad
Chick-fil-A ~ EAT MOR CHIKIN Gift Wrap 10" x 10"

Chick-fil-A · Fast-Casual Food Packaging

Chick-fil-A ~ EAT MOR CHIKIN Gift Wrap 10" x 10"

Poor

Food packaging coating identity unclear without brand disclosure on PFAS risk.

Verdict · SkipPaper gift wrap poses minimal ingestion risk; PFAS coating status unclear but typical for category. Lower concern for intended short-term contact.

This gift wrap likely has grease-resistant treatment for food contact. Chick-fil-A does not disclose PFAS status or coating chemistry publicly, making risk assessment dependent on manufacturer transparency.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

paper gift wrap with water/grease-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Chick-fil-A ~ EAT MOR CHIKIN Gift Wrap is made of, ingredients and materials

This is paper-based gift wrap with a water and grease-resistant coating applied to the surface. The coating's chemical identity is not disclosed by Chick-fil-A; such coatings in food-adjacent paper products commonly contain PFAS (fluorinated compounds) or silicone-based alternatives, though neither can be confirmed here. The paper substrate itself is typically bleached wood pulp with standard dyes and binders, which pose minimal direct hazard for the brief contact time typical of gift wrapping.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water and grease-resistant coatings on paper commonly employ PFAS; Chick-fil-A has not disclosed whether this wrap uses PFAS or silicone alternatives. Exposure risk is low for gift wrapping due to brief contact and no ingestion route, but coating identity remains unknown.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🍳

Coating migration into food upon heat contact

If used to wrap warm foods or placed against heat, coating components could migrate; however, this product is marketed as gift wrap, not food packaging, and brief contact at room temperature poses negligible risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Printing inks and dyes

Paper gift wrap is printed with brand graphics and the EAT MOR CHIKIN cow logo. Standard food-grade printing inks for paper are regulated and unlikely to migrate under normal gift-wrap use; no recalls or contamination reports are on record for this product type.

95/ 100
✅

Bleach residues and paper processing chemicals

Paper substrate is standard bleached pulp. Residual chlorine or processing additives are minimal and not a concern for non-food contact use. No known hazard reported for branded paper gift wrap of this type.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Chick-fil-A has not publicly disclosed the chemical identity of coatings used in its branded packaging or gift wrap. The company maintains no published commitment to avoiding PFAS in packaging, though it has not been subject to major product safety recalls related to coating chemistry. As a food-service brand, Chick-fil-A is not subject to the same packaging transparency requirements as direct food manufacturers, leaving coating composition opaque to consumers.

How it compares in its category

Branded food-service gift wrap typically uses the same water-resistant coating technology as functional food packaging, meaning PFAS or silicone-based treatments are industry standard. Uncoated paper gift wrap or silicone-coated alternatives exist but are less common in promotional merchandise. This product's risk profile is typical for single-use branded wrapping; it is not a primary food contact surface, which reduces exposure concern compared to direct food packaging like boxes or liners.

If you buy it

Use this wrap for its intended purpose, wrapping gifts or non-food items. Avoid prolonged contact with hot foods or liquids, as heat may accelerate coating degradation. Do not microwave items wrapped in this material. Discard after use; do not reuse for food storage. The product is designed for single-use and brief handling, so standard precautions (handwashing after use) are sufficient.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Chick-fil-A has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More fast-casual food packaging grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.