PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall7/ 100Bad
Burger Restaurant Wrapping Paper

Burger King · Fast-Casual Food Packaging

Burger Restaurant Wrapping Paper

Poor

Avoid if concerned, as grease-resistant food packaging often contains PFAS.

Verdict: SkipPFAS in coating is the main concern; paper itself poses minimal risk if used as intended for short food contact only.

Burger King's wrapping paper uses water and grease-resistant coatings common in fast food, likely PFAS-based. The company offers no PFAS disclosure or third-party testing, and coating sources remain unknown.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

bleached paper with grease-resistant coating (likely PFAS-based)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

This product is graded separately as Poor (25/100); typical fluorochemical coatings migrate minimally over minutes of contact but accumulate with repeated consumption. PFAS has been linked to thyroid disease, immune suppression, and liver effects in epidemiological studies, though individual exposure from one meal is negligible.

Source: ATSDR
45/ 100
⚠️

Bleached paper residues (chlorine compounds)

Bleached kraft paper may contain trace dioxins or chlorinated compounds from processing; modern commercial bleaching has reduced but not eliminated this risk. Direct food contact for minutes is low-risk, but chronic exposure from frequent fast-food consumption warrants consideration.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle transfer

If the grease-resistant coating degrades (from heat, moisture, or age), microscopic particles could theoretically transfer to food. No specific recalls or studies document this for Burger King paper, but it remains a theoretical pathway for PFAS uptake.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Ink or print contaminants

Burger King's wrapper inks are unlikely to leach into food under normal conditions (short contact, room temperature, no solvent exposure). No public incidents or testing data flagging ink toxicity for this product exist.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Burger King wrapping paper is bleached kraft paper treated with a grease-resistant coating designed to prevent oil and moisture from soaking through during food transport. The coating is almost certainly a fluorinated compound (PFAS-based), a chemical family chosen because fluorine bonds are extremely stable and water- and oil-repellent. This durability is what makes it effective for fast-food use, but the same property means PFAS does not break down in the environment or human body.

The brand's record and disclosure

Burger King does not publicly disclose material composition or PFAS content in packaging, nor has the brand made commitments to phase out PFAS-based food contact materials. The fast-food industry broadly has been slow to adopt PFAS-free alternatives despite growing regulatory pressure in some U.S. states and the EU. No major recalls or safety violations specific to this wrapping paper are on record, but absence of disclosure does not indicate absence of concern.

How it compares in its category

Most major fast-casual chains (McDonald's, Wendy's, Chipotle) use similar bleached paper with grease-resistant coatings; industry-wide adoption of PFAS in this application remains standard. A small number of chains have committed to PFAS-free alternatives, though cost and performance trade-offs have slowed rollout. Burger King's positioning is representative of the majority practice, not an outlier.

If you buy it

This product is designed for single-use contact with food for minutes to hours only, which presents minimal migration risk compared to reusable food storage or cookware. Do not microwave or heat the wrapped food inside the paper, as heat accelerates chemical migration. If PFAS exposure is a personal health priority, request unwrapped service or choose competitors with documented PFAS-free packaging; the paper itself is not a hazard for typical short-contact food wrapping.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Burger King has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More fast-casual food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.